Archive for March, 2012

Old School Extremists

Posted in Politics on March 16th, 2012

America was founded by courageous, well-educated, and well-spoken extremists. At least the current crop of politicians and the Liberals and Progressives in general would consider them extremists by the standards they’ve decided upon in these latter and lesser times.

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
A Second Amendment Remedy?

Today, George Washington would be on all sorts of FBI, Homeland Security, and ATF watch lists, if they didn’t set him for a “Ruby Ridge.” Indeed, the Liberals and Progressives would decry America’s first President as a right-wing terrorist and un-American for espousing we, the People’s ability to defend ourselves from the government.

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
Holes In Wall Of Separation Between Church And State?

These days, John Adams would be denounced and would be called a theocrat and a “Christian Taliban” for his simple statement. He’d be classed as a Christian extremist and, like Washington, would be on all sorts of FBI, Homeland Security, and ATF watch lists, if they didn’t set him for a “Waco.”

Jeffersonian Extremism
Liberals And Progressive Hate Jefferson

All that needs to be said about how Thomas Jefferson would fare today is that he would never be able to leave the country for fear of being killed in a drone strike authorized by Obama.

No, those old school extremists who stood up for personal liberty, overthrew a tyrant’s rule, and created the United States of America would be hated and reviled, if not lethally worse, by the Left and the current regime today.

That is why their words are more important now then they have ever been since first uttered. When the nation’s government and a large segment of its residents would vilify its Founding Fathers, were they present today, those great men’s old school extremism is desperately needed once again.

It’s No Fluke

Posted in Politics on March 16th, 2012

It’s no fluke that Pelosi brought in activist-cum-student Sandra Fluke to give “testimony” before a House Committee that had absolutely nothing to do with Obama’s planned violation of the First Amendment. It was well-staged theater designed to distract people from the unpleasant truth.

Obama's 2012 Campaign Direction - From jobs to BS
Obama Full Circle – From BS to Jobs to BS Again

Faced with years of continued and unabating unemployment and upcoming elections, Pelosi chose to distract the People with the tried and true, “Oh look, a slut” gambit in order to change to public debate to something other than Obama’s and his Liberals’ utter and massively costly failure to stimulate job growth in America.

Pelosi’s not stupid twat. She knows that her job is on the line since all 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives are in play during the 2012 elections along with 33 seats in the Senate, 23 or which are current filled by Democrats (21) or Left voting Independents (2) – and, almost as an afterthought, Obama’s presidency.

Don’t even bother bitching about my language. I used a rude word about a public figure who gives as good as she gets, who’s called people “hostage-takers” and “unAmerican,” Nancy Pelosi.

The First Amendment was specifically designed for citizens to insult politicians. 😉

The “hearing” not being a court, I’d even posit that Pelosi specifically coached Fluke on just what to say in order to have the best chance to be the biggest distraction possible, not that I’d put illegally coaching a witness in trial beyond Pelosi.

It’s the economy and jobs that are important issues at hand, not Pelosi’s and the LSM’s manufactured “War on Women.” Keep that firmly in mind, especially since Pelosi’s specific opinion on controlling and limiting births is well-documented.

The Shar’ia Times

Posted in Politics, Religion, Society on March 16th, 2012

Dhimmitude For Dummies Some years ago the New York Times, once known as the Grey Lady, degenerated into the Dirty Whore but, in the last decade that rag has chosen more and more to turn against America in favor of whoring itself out to Islam and the filth that follow the ranting of their disgusting Pedophile Prophet.

Their dhimmitude has been long established, but now they’ve taken the next step by attacking the Catholic Church,  while defending their mis-born, subhuman, Muslim masters.

When a group the Godless, Freedom From Religion Foundation, tried to take out a full-page ad in the New York which offensively attacked the Catholic Church and called on people to leave it, the editors at the Dirty Whore thought that was just fine and dandy. But when the American Freedom Defense Initiative sought to take out a deliberately similar ad against Islam, the traitorous dhimmis at the Times refused to run it because it would offend Muslims.

Anti-Catholic Ad Anti Islam Ad

Anti-Catholic = A-OK
Anti-Islam = Nooooo!



They might as well now be called the Shar’ia Times since they chosen to utilize pro-Islam, Anti-Christian “faith-based” editorial control over the advertisements that they’re willing to run in their paper as an overt sign of their submission to the savage baby-rapers of Islam.

Indeed, the filth running the Dirty Whore have now moved beyond mere submission and into the realm of collaboration with America’s terrorist enemies – and we know the proper fate for collaborators.

This is how terrorists win and how Islam spreads. They rely on their own animalistic savagery and the abject cowardice displayed by so many titular members of the Civilized World to coerce people into working for them.

~*~

H/T to Boudica for bringing this to my attention.

The Impartial Cheerleader

Posted in Politics on March 15th, 2012

One thing that Obama has going with him in the war over the constitutionality of his “signature achievement,” Obamacare is his Mini-Me in the ranks of the SCOTUS justices, Elena Kagan.

Kagen - The "Impartial" Cheerleader for her boy, Obama's signature achievement in tyranny, ObamaCare
What Does That Spell? Tyranny! Yay!

Kagan is a shameless supporter of ObamaCare and nobody with an iota of rational thought thinks that Obama’s pet cheerleader and former attack dog – i.e, Solicitor General – will be impartial in the upcoming court case.

America’s domestic enemies, the Liberals and Progressives, will claim that Kagan’s impartiality will be offset by that of Justice Clarence Thomas and, in this particular instance, their ranting are not wholly without merit, though they – the one’s who keeping screeching about “The Patrimony” – are drawing a false equivalency between Kagan’s actual prior support of Obamacare and Justice Thomas’ wife’s employment.

One will notice though, if one bothers to look, that our domestic enemies never deny that Kagan is “in the tank” and a currently living defilement of the office she’s been given.

What’re You In For?

Posted in Politics on March 15th, 2012

It is the nature of governments to make laws in order to criminalize the citizenry’s actions or, possibly coming soon, inactions. This is how the government maintains and expands its power.

New Crimes - Not buying ObamaCare or anything else the Obama Regime tells you to buy
New Crime – Failure To Purchase Health Insurance

Very shortly the US Supreme Court will begin deciding whether or not the Obama Regime will be allowed to make not purchasing a product or service, government-approved health insurance in this case, a federal crime punishable by hefty fines and, if those fines are not paid, by wage garnishment, seizure of assets, and/or incarceration under the existing federal tax evasion laws.

ObamaCare also includes a provision for adding 16,000 additional federal agents to enforce this new criminalization of personal choice and individual liberty, so the Obama Regime and the Liberals in Congress are obviously placing a high value upon enforcing this tyranny.

Hopefully, the SCOTUS will strike down this law as unconstitutional. Their doing so will alleviate the existential need for Americans to exercise the Gods-given 2nd Amendment rights to strike down the tyrants and their enforcers who, by providing material aid and comfort to the enemy, willfully violated their oaths of allegiance to America and made themselves valid targets in war.

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down.