The Butcher Leaves

chas-freemanChas Freeman – the thankfully now-former Obama nominee to chair the National Intelligence Council (NIC) – has recused himself from consideration for the position. The man who endorsed the Tienanmen Square Massacre claimed that he couldn’t perform the duties of the office due to public outcry.

America and all the free peoples of the world should rejoice. This is a rare victory.

There has been much uproar over Mr. Freeman’s possibly inappropriate loyalties to foreign regimes such as the Wahabists in Saudi Arabia and the Communists in China. Both his anti-American positions and his antisemitism have been roundly decried – as has his belief that governments should murder protesters.

As I have said earlier, I wasn’t too bothered by Freeman’s antisemitism, considering it a good shield against Rahm Emanuel’s Zionism. That view has now changed.

The would-be butcher, Chas Freeman’s exit rant:

You will by now have seen the statement by Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair reporting that I have withdrawn my previous acceptance of his invitation to chair the National Intelligence Council.

I have concluded that the barrage of libelous distortions of my record would not cease upon my entry into office.  The effort to smear me and to destroy my credibility would instead continue.  I do not believe the National Intelligence Council could function effectively while its chair was under constant attack by unscrupulous people with a passionate attachment to the views of a political faction in a foreign country.  I agreed to chair the NIC to strengthen it and protect it against politicization, not to introduce it to efforts by a special interest group to assert control over it through a protracted political campaign.

As those who know me are well aware, I have greatly enjoyed life since retiring from government.  Nothing was further from my mind than a return to public service.  When Admiral Blair asked me to chair the NIC I responded that I understood he was “asking me to give my freedom of speech, my leisure, the greater part of my income, subject myself to the mental colonoscopy of a polygraph, and resume a daily commute to a job with long working hours and a daily ration of political abuse.”  I added that I wondered “whether there wasn’t some sort of downside to this offer.”  I was mindful that no one is indispensable; I am not an exception.  It took weeks of reflection for me to conclude that, given the unprecedentedly challenging circumstances in which our country now finds itself abroad and at home, I had no choice but accept the call to return to public service.  I thereupon resigned from all positions that I had held and all activities in which I was engaged.  I now look forward to returning to private life, freed of all previous obligations.

I am not so immodest as to believe that this controversy was about me rather than issues of public policy.  These issues had little to do with the NIC and were not at the heart of what I hoped to contribute to the quality of analysis available to President Obama and his administration.  Still, I am saddened by what the controversy and the manner in which the public vitriol of those who devoted themselves to sustaining it have revealed about the state of our civil society.  It is apparent that we Americans cannot any longer conduct a serious public discussion or exercise independent judgment about matters of great importance to our country as well as to our allies and friends.

The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful  lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American understanding of trends and events in the Middle East.  The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth.  The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that it favors.

There is a special irony in having been accused of improper regard for the opinions of foreign governments and societies by a group so clearly intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government – in this case, the government of Israel.  I believe that the inability of the American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any option for US policies in the Middle East opposed by the ruling faction in Israeli politics has allowed that faction to adopt and sustain policies that ultimately threaten the existence of the state of Israel.  It is not permitted for anyone in the United States to say so.  This is not just a tragedy for Israelis and their neighbors in the Middle East; it is doing widening damage to the national security of the United States.

The outrageous agitation that followed the leak of my pending appointment will be seen by many to raise serious questions about whether the Obama administration will be able to make its own decisions about the Middle East and related issues.  I regret that my willingness to serve the new administration has ended by casting doubt on its ability to consider, let alone decide what policies might best serve the interests of the United States rather than those of a Lobby intent on enforcing the will and interests of a foreign government.

In the court of public opinion, unlike a court of law, one is guilty until proven innocent.  The speeches from which quotations have been lifted from their context are available for anyone interested in the truth to read.  The injustice of the accusations made against me has been obvious to those with open minds.  Those who have sought to impugn my character are uninterested in any rebuttal that I or anyone else might make.

Still, for the record: I have never sought to be paid or accepted payment from any foreign government, including Saudi Arabia or China, for any service, nor have I ever spoken on behalf of a foreign government, its interests, or its policies.  I have never lobbied any branch of our government for any cause, foreign or domestic.  I am my own man, no one else’s, and with my return to private life, I will once again – to my pleasure – serve no master other than myself.  I will continue to speak out as I choose on issues of concern to me and other Americans.

I retain my respect and confidence in President Obama and DNI Blair.  Our country now faces terrible challenges abroad as well as at home.  Like all patriotic Americans, I continue to pray that our president can successfully lead us in surmounting them.

— Chas Freeman
March 10, 2009 exit rant

It’s truly amazing. This piece of filth’s hatred of Jews is so profound that he was forced by it to essentially declare that the Jews and the “Jewish Lobby” libeled him and kept him from being able to to hold the chair the National Intelligence Council. I haven’t read this level of antisemitism and paranoia since I read The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Freeman should hook up with Cynthia McKinney. They could trade stories about blaming it on “da Joos.” 😉

Great Gods on their thrones! Even ABC – not exactly the staunchest ally of Israel, Jews, or American Middle eastern policy – couldn’t silently choke down this bullshit.

What’s perplexing about this that so much of what critics objected to were Freeman’s statements, in full context. His record was picked apart like that of any other controversial nominee — sometimes fairly, sometimes not so — but only in Freeman’s case does the nominee make an allegation that a foreign power was lurking nefariously somehow behind it all.

Jake Tapper
ABC News Senior White House Correspondent

I have to say that this was a close shave for America and the Free World. Obama almost managed to appoint a man with a disturbing agenda and beliefs to be the head of our National Intelligence Council. Can anyone imagine what could have happened with a creature like Chas Freeman in a sensitive position like that?

Tags: | | | | |

5 Responses to “The Butcher Leaves”

  1. chiefopiner Says:

    *****Snark Alert*****

    Here Mr. Freeman, take my handkerchief. It’s difficult to watch a grown man cry like that.

    Can someone call the janitor, we need puddle cleanup here?

    You know, if you take away his glasses and darken his hair color he could almost pass as Norm on Cheers!

    /end snark

    Whew, glad he is out of the running. Next victim please?

  2. jonolan Says:

    You’re right; Freeman does look like an elderly version of Norm from Cheers. That’s hilarious!

  3. Josh Brandt Says:

    I did have a response for this one but I think my opinion might better be explained in song:

  4. jonolan Says:

    Ok, that was funny, Josh – and you get huge bonus points from me for using Queen.

  5. Josh Brandt Says:

    lulz, thx

Leave a Reply