The Duffer-in-Chief

More and more of late we see, read, and here much derision and rancor directed at Obama’s preference for recreation, especially golfing, over attempting to do his job as President of the United States of America and titular leader of the Free World.

Notwithstanding the fact that there’s a lot of truth in these assertions and complaints about Obama’s lack of involvement in his job, Americans really need to just stop with these reactionary complaints about the “semi-retired” nature of Obama’s presidency.


Function: noun

Date: 1756


  1. A) a peddler especially of cheap flashy articles
    B) something counterfeit or worthless
  2. an incompetent, ineffectual, or clumsy person; especially: a mediocre golfer

As Obama is most certainly, irrespective of which specific definition you choose, a duffer, it’s best for America and the American people if the boy just stays on the golf course.

Look at what Obama has tried to accomplish during his few forays into either domestic or foreign policy and look at what the effects of those efforts has been. Based upon this evidence there is no reasonably belief that anything that the Duffer-in-Chief did would be in the best interests of the American people. Why, this being the case, would any of us want him to spend less time on the links and more time doing the job of POTUS?

Don’t encourage the boy to work. Just let him do the job he was really hired to do – being the First Black POTUS and a token of “Post-Racial” America. Anything more is a clear and present danger to our country.

Tags: | | | | | |

2 Responses to “The Duffer-in-Chief”

  1. Alan Scott Says:

    Our leader from behind is finally ready to take on the JV team of terrorists. Now that the polls say it is safe to do so. Since the journalist beheadings public opinion has shifted to hawkish. Who knew. No other deaths have mattered. It is politically safe now for Obama to go to war.

  2. jonolan Says:

    I really don’t think that he’s ready or that the boy will ever be ready to eradic ISIS. At most he will attempt to contain them in southern Iraq and Syria, After all, they’ll then be partitioning Iraq into three sections – Shiite, Sunni, and Kurdish – like he and Biden wanted in the first place, and giving Assad problems.

Leave a Reply