Reflections From a Murky Pond

Hope is beautiful, especially when it’s the hope that Blacks are finally changing and integrating into American society and that hope for change is exemplified by the gorgeous Stacey Dash.

Yes, the lovely Ms. Dash came out in support of Mitt Romney instead of abiding by the mindless racial solidarity of the “Black Community.” She has also stood both strong and calm in the face of the heinous hate-filled and racist slurs that the “Black Community,” Liberals, and Progressives have heaped upon her for her audacity to think for herself and make her decisions upon the content of the respective candidates’ character as opposed to their racial self-identification.

Vote for Romney. The only choice for your future. @mittromney @teamromney #mittromney #VOTE #voteromney twitter.com/REALStaceyDash…

— Stacey Dash (@REALStaceyDash) October 7, 2012

Her choice, the reasons for it, and the strength of character that Ms. Dash has shown in the face of our domestic enemies’ attacks upon her should kindle hope in the hearts of Americans. She shows us all that there is hope that Blacks can and do, in a growing number of instances, change and integrate into American life, leaving the hate, racism, angst, and self-pity of the “Black Community” behind in favor of fully joining the nation that they’ve been graced with privilege of being born into.

I, like many Americans, could wax vitriolic upon the sick and disgusting behavior of Liberals, Progressives, and their minority tenants in response to Stacey Dash’s tweet, but what would be the point? Of course they hate her now; she left their plantation and they can’t abide by that. Any Black doing so strikes right to heart of the victimology and power base; a beautiful, sexy, Black actress doing so was bound to strip the thin veneer of civility off of them and show their true colors.

I’d much rather focus on this most beautiful hope for change – real hope, needed and worthwhile change. 😉

As An Aside: You can find some more explicit reasons for you to “support” Stacey Dash here.

As all American know, the narcissistic little boy currently fouling our capital doesn’t care for- or about our laws except when he can’t find a way of breaking them with impunity. It’s bold, even for Obama though, to flout them so openly as he’s just done.

Perhaps fear and desperation have caused him to decompensate, or he’s just returned to his roots.

It’s a bold move for Obama to tell various military contractors not to abide by the WARN Act, signed into law by President George H.W. Bush in 1989, and notify their employees of pending layoffs until after the November elections.

“We assume because it’s the law that it will occur,” Hicks says. “But the implementation of it is not necessarily going to take place on the second of January. It’s likely to unfold over a longer period of time, which gives us the latitude to wait.” Lockheed Martin has come to the same conclusion.

The decisions followed reassurances from the Obama administration that these cuts are not unavoidable. After all, Congress can decide at any time to come to a budget agreement, and toss out those automatic cuts known as sequestration. In addition, some defense jobs rely on ongoing contracts that won’t be affected — not right away, at least.

For those reasons, the White House said, the defense industry doesn’t have to send out notices under a law called the WARN Act, which is supposed to help workers prepare for layoffs.

What it really comes down to is that Obama told these companies to “fuck the law” and do it his way so as to cover his worthless, grifting, ass until after the 2012 elections are over. The boy knows that massive layoffs would hurt his chances and a little thing like the law of the land isn’t going to stand in his way.

Funny, in 2007 when President Bush Jr. was in office, Obama wanted the WARN Act notices extended from 60 to 90 days before reasonably foreseeable layoffs. How the worm has turned.

That’s not surprising though. What are the jobs of 2 million Americans is comparison to the boy’s own job? It’s not as if the filth has ever shown any concern for the American worker except to try to finagle their votes and campaign contributions.

Approximately 2 million jobs might be axed if Congress does nothing to prevent sequestration’s mandatory budget cuts from taking effect Jan. 2, 2013, according to a Sept. 24, 2012, letter to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., from a bipartisan group of senators. Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., and Graham noted that a million of these jobs—many of which would be with federal contractors—would be due to DOD cuts.

There’s no pressing need to manage that or to inform those Americans in timely and legally required manner of the upcoming changes in their circumstances.  They’re not entitled to such consideration if extending it hampers the Campaigner-in-Chief’s goals or his whore’s taxpayer funded lifestyle.

In any even though, the companies affected by this won’t be harmed if they follow Obama’s command. The boy’s already promised to use our tax dollars to reimburse for any costs they incur by doing so.

If sequestration occurs and results in plant closings or mass layoffs, then any resulting costs for WARN Act liability, as well as attorney’s fees and litigation costs would qualify as costs covered by the contracting agency, the OMB specified.

But then, that’s Obama for you. The vermin does whatever he wants that he thinks he can get away with or shuck and jive his ass out of the consequences resulting from doing  and then get the American people to pick up the tab.

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. Remember that the law is meant to protect Americans, not our enemies or their crotch-droppings.

The “Black Community” and the various Liberals and Progressives who are in bed with them betimes moan and whine that the MSM almost totally ignores Black-on-Black crime, reporting upon it only when it’s particularly sensational in nature.

Well, now we all have some empirical data that supports their proposition of bias.

It seems that the Obama Campaign came out and threatened a member of the NAACP because he didn’t support Obama’s reelection attempt. Of course, the lamestream media has almost entirely ignored the incident.

The President of the South Suburban Branch of the NAACP alleges a director of the re-election campaign of Barack Obama has threatened and intimidated him because he doesn’t support the president.

After saying that he does not support President Obama, David Lowery, President of the South Suburban Branch of the NAACP in Chicago, said that an Obama campaign official threatened and intimidated him, CBS Chicago reported Thursday.

Lowery said that he believes the threat came during a phone conversation with Louis Raymond, the Illinois political director for Obama for America, CBS said. He also told WBBM that the call “was intended to intimidate” him.

Lowery – who does not support either candidate for President – said that he does not believe Obama is addressing issues important to the black community.

“You know what? I know everything about you,” Raymond allegedly said as Lowery was explaining his concerns.

“We’ve been watching you, and since you don’t support Obama, we’ll deal with you,” Lowery recalled Raymond saying before hanging up.

It does seem that in certain cases the lamestream media does choose to ignore Black-on-Black crime. They certainly do so when breaking their code of silence would harm Obama’s quest to keep his job.

Now, if it had been Mitt Romney or any other White politician whose campaign tried Chicago style gangster politics on a Black activist, the incident would have made international headlines and heralded the end of that politician’s career.

But you can’t blame Obama, apparently even if you’re Black yourself. Between Obama’s control of various federal agencies and connections to the criminal element of Chicago’s South Side, it’s not a thing that you want to do if you’re hoping for a long and happy life…

The general consensus seems to be that Mitt Romney won the debate with Barack Obama last Thursday night in Denver, CO. I frankly disagree with this consensus. Romney did not win; Obama lost. There was little in Romney’s performance that was praiseworthy, but there was nothing that was so in Obama’s performance.

The First Romney v. Obama Debate

After watching this political kabuki play, reading the transcripts of it, and subjecting myself to the lamestream media’s analysis of it, I’m left with the conclusion that Romney “won” only because Obama did even manage “Present” on that night.

The Obama that America’s domestic enemies rallied behind in 2008 was not in attendance at that debate. Only, a tired, stilted, stuttering man who was obviously in over his head and trying to defend a lack of job performance that would and should land any normal person without a job.

While Obama quite obviously neither had nor was competent to develop a strategy for being the POTUS, the boy’s always had a solid strategy for being elected as one.

It’s Enough To Fool Enough Of The People One More Time

Of course, Obama and his handlers don’t seem too skilled at drafting fallback positions. This results in them and Obama’s core constituency falling back into less than coordinated and thought out reactions to the unpleasant and unexpected.

No Time To Explain. Grab A Cactus!

It’s not as if Americans can blame either Obama or his constituency for this though. It’s just an example of his and their cultural roots and core ideology of entitlement. They really help thinking that whatever they do should be good enough to achieve an outcome on par with that of people who actually work and plan for things.