Reflections From a Murky Pond

A pretty face may hide an evil mind and fine words may hide a cruel heart. What lies beneath the surface is much more important because it is the truth, however ugly, cold, and evil.

Ph’nglui Mglw’nafh Obama R’lyeh Wgah’nagl Fhtagn

Too few Americans really asked what lay beneath the fine but largely empty words of Obama in 2008 and, in failing to ask, they allowed the Liberals and their minority tenants to place Obama in the Presidency.

It is of existential imperative that Americans ask that question now instead of hiding in ignorance, thinking that all will be well and that the darkness is ready to consume them, their children, and their children’s children.

Freed from his chains of needing to be reelected, what will Obama do if he’s allowed to stay in the White House for four more years?

In 2008 Obama was seen as the harbinger of change. He ran as the Great Black Hope of the Left and their minority tenants. It’s now 2012 and Obama is continuing his campaign for the Presidency.

Oddly perhaps, not much has changed in the intervening four years…

Obama-Zombie Fangirls Circa 2008

Back in 2008, with the death of boy bands and Justin Bieber not being on the scene yet, Obama had a lot of rock star appeal to impressionable young, White girls inexperienced in both politics and their own sexuality.

Obama-Zombie Fangirls Circa 2012

Now in 2012, the hysteria has faded but the devotion has turned from that of groupies into that of worshipers drinking in their master’s “wisdom.”

Nope, not much has changed at all in the last four years. Obama is still reliant upon the pliable vacuity of his followers and still finding them in the same places and amongst the same demographics.

That Was Then

America’s domestic enemies, the Liberals and Progressives, have to-date been quite enamored of- and staunchly supportive of Julian Assange’s anarcho-terrorist organization, Wikileaks. They’ve heralded Wikileaks as soldiers in the war against America and her allies and lent whatever material and emotion aid and comfort to Assange and his cronies that they could.

This Is Now

But now that Wikileaks has turned traitor, as it were, to the Liberals’ and Progressives’ cause and published data that indicates the Democrats committed election fraud in order to get their boy, Obama elected, can we expect this to change and for Wikileaks to be a valid target in their eyes?

Wikileaks recently published stolen internal email from the private intelligence and analysis firm, Stratfor which indicate that Black Democrats in Philadelphia, PA and various locations in Ohio did, in fact commit election in the 2008 presidential elections and that Senator McCain knew about it but refused to press charges or go public with the data for the good of the nation.

The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to “out”.

Making public such accusations without deriding editorials, especially when they involve Philadelphia and Ohio where voting “irregularities” were complain of and ignored by the Obama Regime, is a direct violation of current Liberal and Progressive orthodoxy. Will the Left remain silent on such heresy?

Worse perhaps, Wikileaks disseminated the documents without sanitizing them. Those documents hit the public while still pinpointing Blacks as the criminal element having committed election fraud in order to “elect” their First Black President. According to the Leftists’ dogma that’s racist. Will the Liberals and Progressives still support such a racist organization as Wikileaks?

In the wake of Wikileaks’ turning against Obama by publishing evidence of his being “elected” through the criminal activities of Black Democrats will the Liberals and Progressives continue to support and lend aid and comfort to this anarcho-terrorist organization?

As has been discussed here before, there’s little or truth in any statement blaming a POTUS for high fuel prices or handing them credit for lowering fuel prices. No President has as any real power to affect such prices in the short-term.

That being said, it’s not truly unfair to chastise Obama over this issue because he has repeatedly “no quite called for” exactly a drastic rise in fuel prices in order to make it seem that he wanted to make the Liberals’ dream of “green energy” a reality, however Dystopian.

As Obama “Promised,” Skyrocketing Fuel Prices Are Here

H/T to Soylent Green for the image.

Words have consequences and throughout the boy’s 2008 presidential election campaign Obama made statements endorsing a massive, though gradual, rise in fuel prices. So too does the choice of whom one surrounds themselves with have consequences and Obama appointed Steven Chu as his regime’s Secretary of Energy – a man who has been quite open about his desire to spike US energy cost up to European levels in order to make “green energy” commercially viable.

Given the above, while it’s untrue that Obama has raised or failed to lower gasoline and other fuel prices, it’s not unfair to chide him over them since their what he seemed to want his base to believe that he wanted. It’s a case of “Beware what you wish for,” especially if you wish out loud on an open microphone.

Back in the lead up to the 2008 elections Obama was all about spreading the wealth. Amid the plethora of not-quite-promises that Obama jabbered during that campaign, that one message was said clearly and openly. Spread the wealth. And this bit of Socialist rhetoric helped carry him into the White House.

Campaign Obama – 2008 v. 2012

Once installed in office, Obama had to start his reelection campaign – after all, keeping his job as long as possible is always Job #1. This presented a problem for the Campaigner-in-Chief; how do you redistribute wealth, after you’ve gone to such great lengths to convince your followers that it’s a declining and failing resource?

Fortunately for Obama, his handlers were up to the challenge. They managed to shift their boy’s message from, “Make Them Pay” to “Make Them Hurt Too” – and spreading poverty is so much easier than spreading wealth anyway. 😉