Reflections From a Murky Pond

Queerish Irony: When all the lies the gays ranted to the world and presumably by and large believed themselves come back around and bite them on their faggot asses.

In this particular, disgusting case it’s their lie that accepting, legitimizing, and normalizing homosexuality and various sexual/gender disorders won’t lead to a similar thing for pedophilia. It was a lie. It was a dangerous and disgusting lie, and a stupid one to boot. This is proven by certain sorts feeling empowered to rant at children that we “can’t” even call them pedophiles and that they’re Minor Attracted Persons (MAPs)

Stop calling them that [Pedophiles]. You’re not allowed to label people like that. Stop it, Diego. We are not going to call them that. We’re going to call them, MAPs. Minor-attracted persons. So don’t judge people just because they want to have sex with a 5-year-old.

— Amber Parker
Franklin High School

And this creature, Amber Parker is not the first to use this specific euphemism to describe and normalize pedophiles. Years ago, Dr. Allyn Walker, an assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice at Old Dominion used and perhaps coined the term Minor Attracted Person(s). It even wrote called A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor-Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity, defending them and seeking special protections for them. And then there’s Miranda Galbreath, a licensed sex therapist and counselor with the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, who has taken great pains to explain that the majority of people make “incorrect assumptions” about Minor Attracted Persons and that those assumptions “create harm for an already marginalized population.” Parker is just the first we’ve heard of being so overt about it in our schools in a position of influence and authority over our children.

And there we are, sadly. The LGBTQ+?! activists and their ever-ready-for-perversions enablers have essentially made their lifestyle and sexual choices “acceptable” and protected by both law and #CancelCulture despite being told time and time again that this would lead to similar – and more than likely similarly successful – things and movements for pedophilia in all but it’s most extreme variants. And, they were wrong – rather ironical but not in any way unexpectedly so.

Disgusting as it is to any right-thinking, actual human being, the irony comes from the fact that every argument used by queers to defend their sexual choices apply equally to pedophiles. They’re born that way; you love (lust after) who you love (lust after); If you don’t like it you’re just a Christofascist bigot. All these argument can be and are used by pedophiles and their enablers to defend their sexual choices, and with an equal weight of logic and truth behind the arguments.

And, their trump card of “between consenting adults” doesn’t even work that well, because age of consent laws are just societal constructs and vary greatly by culture/nation, ranging from 11 to 21.

Worse and what will be a growing problem, is that the declining age of puberty means that hebephilia and ephebophilia – both psychological terms and neither, just like homosexuality, considered a mental disorder under the DSM – is going to be both more common and impact younger and younger children. And yes, it will also impact more adults, who will in apparently perfect sanity be attracted to younger people.

Yes, queerish irony indeed! Every argument and a majority of the terms, e.g., marginalized population, are being used by pedophiles and their enablers in exactly the same way that homosexuals and their enablers used them to gain legally mandated protections and privileges. Just. Like. We. Said. They. Would.

Honestly, I’d ask what comes next, legalizing incest. But that shipped sailed a while back.

Please, go ahead. Tell me how Biden’s handlers – because Senile, Doddering Joe sure ain’t doing anything – are making America better. I’ll wait, though I might need the lifespan of a tortoise to get an answer. Well, an answer that isn’t their sort taking credit for improvements set in motion by President Trump.

People were already lazy. They already were preferring to shop online and just have as much of what they needed and/or wanted delivered to their door. The coronavirus panicdemic and the Dems’ lock-downs just exacerbated this and fixed it into our culture. Still though, like COVID-19 itself, modern delivery culture has it’s upsides.

Now that’s some real old school gaming right there! 😆 And here I thought that my 1st gaming console being one of the ones with Pong, Breakout, and Basketball games and no cartridges was old school, especially since it a few years later when I got my Atari 2600.

But then, according to certain sorts of scientists – really “Sciencetismists\” – this funny image has a 50/50 chance of being true-ish, with it only being “true-ish” because I’ve no evidence to support whether or not pre-human eras were played-through or just provided as Lore. 😉

It’s quite true that Chicago was safer for the majority of residents and visitors during the past times when Al Capone and his mob effectively ran the city than it is today under Lightfoot or her predecessors of the last few decades. This is, however, an grossly unfair and misleading comparison. Society was different and objectively better in Capone’s time than it is now or has been for some time, and that is what’s causing the city’s collapse and increased danger.

Simply put, society in general and the specific demographic causing most modern violence in Chicago was better in that it was less prone to serious violence in the 1920s than it has been since the 1960s. Hence, while objectively true, the statement that Chicago was safer when Al Capone ran the city is misleading and unfair to a large extent.

Yes, the politicians placed in charge in the past few decades have done nothing to stop the problems, mostly because they cared more about votes from the problem groups and their enablers than in safety and the rule of law. But still, we’re not the same. It’s, while true, it’s not at all fair to compare the current population with their betters of bygone days.