Reflections From a Murky Pond

Claims Of A Rigged Election

Democrats from Obama on down are ranting how Trump and the American people are harming the electoral process because we aren’t shy about telling telling the world that we fully expect it to be a rigged election, installing Hillary as POTUS irrespective of the actual will of we, the People.

Funny thing that, since the Democrats did it to a much greater extent and to greater, lasting harm to America’s electoral process back in 2000 when George W. Bush defeated Al Gore. It reeks of hypocrisy but is to be expected. Democrats and the sort that vote for them have always maintained a double standard, with Americans being held to a higher and stricter standard than those who tend to vote for Democrats.

Hillary Fears Greatness

That part of what passes for Hillary’s campaign that hasn’t simply focused on how her reproductive organs entitle her to the Presidency has largely been focused on deriding and attacking her opponent, Donald Trump. And yet, little to none of Hillary’s negative campaigning against Trump has actually attacked the efficacy of his policy positions or his demeanor and rhetoric. Simply put, it seems not that she believes that Trump is wrong but that she fears – indeed, is terrified of – Trump’s success and the restoration of America’s greatness.

This is both very telling and completed expected and rational. Hillary’s aspirations require her constituency and her constituency can’t survive a resurgence in American greatness. This is not to say that the majority of them literally wouldn’t survive it. Instead the majority of her constituency would thrive under it and no longer be the sort to support her. That is Hillary’s greatest fear and the greatest fear of the cynical leaders of the various agendist movements that support her and other Liberals and Progressives.

That’s the thing about these sorts. They can only gain power when and if they can convince the masses that possess some “protected trait” that they’re disadvantaged and that this is because of the actions or, as is more often the case these days, inaction of the unprotected, normative members of society.

As it’s almost time for another election in America and as we’ve someone who’s both a Democrat and a Black controlling the DoJ, let’s review the fact that not all ID requests are considered equal.

Yes, it’s true. The appropriateness and political correctness of states requiring government issued photo ID in order for a citizen or resident to purchase something or perform some action is ONLY considered racist by America’s domestic enemies when it involves voting and then only when that voting involves minorities, most specifically voting by the Blacks.

Apparently the Blacks seem to have some problem with acquiring a photo ID, something that the vast majority of Americans have no problem doing. Hence, insofar as they and their Liberal and Progressive enablers – and, of course, the Democrat party’s vote farmers – are concerned such things are racist solely because the Blacks seem to have some problem with meeting this simple requirement.

Of course, as is sadly normal for these sorts, our domestic enemies are far more laser focused on a specific result that favors themselves than in making America better. Consider that, if they focused upon getting the Blacks to meet the basic requirement of having a government issued photo ID, not only would voting requirements not be an issue but the Blacks would actually not be so disadvantaged in most facets of life by not having one in the first place.

Our Last Chance To Defend The SCOTUS

If any American still needs a compelling reason to vote for Trump in the upcoming 2016 elections, this is it. If Hillary is elected, the makeup of the SCOTUS will be irrevocably changed and those Liberal “justices” will fundamentally transform America through judicial activism.

Madonna For Hillary – The Oldest PAC

On Tuesday, 18 October 2016, aging pop star Madonna raised some eyebrows by offering to give blow jobs to voters who cast their ballots for Hillary Clinton.

If you vote for Hillary Clinton, I will give you a blow job. OK? I’m really good. I’m not a douche and I’m not a tool. I take my time, I have a lot of eye contact and I do swallow.

— Madonna

OK, leaving aside the fact that any mention of oral sex and the Clintons is “matrimonially insensitive,” this begs the question of since when did prostitution become the manner in which women promoted other women in society, business, and/or politics?

Given that prostitution is rightfully called the oldest profession, I’d hazard the guess that it’s been the manner such things were done since we invented society, business, and politics. Think of it as the oldest PAC. 😛

Of course, the utter lack of outrage among the Feminists shows their hypocrisy in the matter. Given that even “Sex Positive” Feminists – is that an oxymoron or a unicorn? – are against blow jobs and stridently against swallowing, the lack of outrage on their part shows the world that they don’t have a moral position, only a political one.

And…There’s that pesky, little matter of US Federal law. Madonna’s offer to fellate men who vote for Hillary may run afoul of the penumbra of 18 U.S. Code § 597. I’m force to say “may” because that statute requires an expenditure and one could easily argue that Madonna would be spending nothing to suck off these men. Indeed! One could argue that it’s the men who would be “spending.” 😆 Also, as prostitute isn’t legal in America, there may be an odd loophole where an illegal expenditure can’t be legally classed as an expenditure for purposes of the law.

NOTE: Just enjoy or hate the sarcasm. I’m very well aware that Madonna said this as part of her intro for comedienne Amy Schumer at her recent Madison Square Gardens performance. As such, this was all in good, “clean” fun. Hell! If it wasn’t, old Slick Willy would already be line up. 😛