Archive for the '2012 Election' Category

Gay For Pay

Posted in 2012 Election, Politics on May 17th, 2012

Summing up Obama’s “evolved” stance on Gay Marriage is really quite easy. It’s a simple case of his being Gay For Pay.

Obama On Gay Marriage
Sure! Obama Will Go Gay – For $15 Million In Donations

The Obama Campaign and the Dems in general were looking at loosing the financial support of both Queers and seriously pro-Queer donors, a situation made acutely worse by North Carolina passing Amendment 1 by a wide margin, defining marriage solely as a union between a man and a woman in the state’s Constitution.

So the Campaigner-in-Chief, under the direction of his handlers, had to say something, preferable something nuanced with lots of exit pathways and few commitments.

At a certain point, I’ve just concluded that– for me personally, it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that– I think same-sex couples should be able to get married. Now– I have to tell you that part of my hesitation on this has also been I didn’t want to nationalize the issue. There’s a tendency when I weigh in to think suddenly it becomes political and it becomes polarized.

And what you’re seeing is, I think, states working through this issue– in fits and starts, all across the country. Different communities are arriving at different conclusions, at different times. And I think that’s a healthy process and a healthy debate. And I continue to believe that this is an issue that is gonna be worked out at the local level, because historically, this has not been a federal issue, what’s recognized as a marriage.

Yeah, the boy will do Gay for Pay alright. He’s got limits though – no Full Service; he won’t bend over that far, not when it might cost him more than he’s getting for it. 😉

~*~

I’ve got a more important and pressing question than what Obama wants people to believe is his personal stance on Gay Marriage is though. Does America’s newest rent boy think that the queers – single, involved, it’s complicated, or married – could use some jobs?

Obama’s Jobs Strategy

Posted in 2012 Election, Politics on May 14th, 2012

Plenty of Americans wonder if Obama has a jobs strategy given that America’s faltering economy and continued grim prospects for employment are dark shadows on Americans’ consciousnesses. They’re afraid that Obama and his handlers have no plan or strategy at all.

From what I can see, these people are wrong; they’re scared for the wrong reason. The boy and his handlers do have a jobs strategy but it is one based upon a war of attrition, misdirection, and legalisms. That’s why Americans should be both afraid and lethally angry.

Obama just plans to wait it out and use “nuanced” mendacity and misdirection to “deal with” the nation’s unemployment problem.

Congrats! You're no longer making me look badCongrats! You’re No Longer Making Me Look Bad

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported Friday that in April US unemployment fell to 8.1%, which is the lowest it’s been since January 2009. This is something that will help Obama a bit in the polls because his constituency is ignorant and easily led.

If more people were aware of the fact that the drop in unemployment has mainly been due to people leaving the labor force, meaning the BLS had stopped counting them as unemployed, things might be quite different and quite worse for Obama.

In actuality 12.5 million Americans are still unemployed, and according to the BLS a record 88.4 million Americans are officially considered as being “not in the labor force.” At 63.6% the labor-force participation rate – defined as the percentage of the work-age population either working or looking for work – is the lowest since December 1981. Yes, this is the lowest American labor-force participation rate in thirty years!

Not that Obama should be taken too strongly to task for the current real unemployment figures. The government does not meaningfully create jobs. He can only be blamed for fostering a legislative atmosphere that is hostile to business, making it that much harder for those businesses to justify adding staff or expanding domestic operations.

No, what Americans should punish Obama for is his presiding over- and cheering on from his bully pulpit a Congress that added a record setting $5 trillion to America’s national debt in under four years, most of it spent supposedly to create jobs.

That is what Obama and the Liberals in Congress should be punished for. They’re whole “job creating / saving” spending glut is either a $5+ trillion lie or the biggest example of fiscal, legislative, and governmental failure in the history of America.

It’s time for Americans to teach Obama and his cronies what unemployment means. It time that we, the People made it a personal issue to the them and their families.

Not Much Has Changed

Posted in 2008 Election, 2012 Election, Humor on May 10th, 2012

In 2008 Obama was seen as the harbinger of change. He ran as the Great Black Hope of the Left and their minority tenants. It’s now 2012 and Obama is continuing his campaign for the Presidency.

Oddly perhaps, not much has changed in the intervening four years…


Obama-Zombie Fangirls Circa 2008

Back in 2008, with the death of boy bands and Justin Bieber not being on the scene yet, Obama had a lot of rock star appeal to impressionable young, White girls inexperienced in both politics and their own sexuality.


Obama-Zombie Fangirls Circa 2012

Now in 2012, the hysteria has faded but the devotion has turned from that of groupies into that of worshipers drinking in their master’s “wisdom.”

Nope, not much has changed at all in the last four years. Obama is still reliant upon the pliable vacuity of his followers and still finding them in the same places and amongst the same demographics.

Waba Squaw

Posted in 2012 Election, Politics on May 2nd, 2012

Elizabeth Warren - Waba Squaw Speaks With Serpent's TongueElizabeth Warren is the multimillionaire Harvard law professor running against Sen. Scott Brown for the US Senate in Massachusetts as a Democratic party populist-progressive champion.

She’s run into a problem though in her bid to unseat the surprisingly popular Massachusetts Republican. It’s not an uncommon problem for academics and politicians. She lied about her background so as to game the system.

One has to wonder how desperate Harvard was for “diversity” – and possibly the the funding and grants that come with it – that they accepted the fair-skinned, blonde-haired, blue-eyed Warren as a Native American. Both Harvard and this lying little waba squaw (white woman) have a lot nerve and even more explaining to do.

NOTE: “Waba Squaw” is from the Wampanoag dialect of Algonquin, the dominant native language in Massachusetts, where this affront occurred.

As Warren claimed that she got her blood from the Cherokee people, “Unega Agehya” would have been equally valid but less understandable to the majority of Whites.

She and Harvard both got caught in their self-serving, racial lies though, and the Native Tribal organizations, especially the Cherokee Nation are not pleased, nor are the people of Massachusetts.

Size Matters

Posted in 2012 Election on April 28th, 2012

Crybaby Obama - That's all he is; a petulant little boy crying because it's not fair that he's judged by his character and actions.Size matters – both the size of the job and the size of the character, will, and abilities of the man tasked with undertaking it. If these two don’t match up, either the job goes undone or misdone or the man is wasted.

The worst case scenario is a big job being performed by a small man. This always leads to failure, as the small man can neither do the job nor accept his own failings.

This is exactly the crisis facing America today, as Rep. Boehner bravely pointed out this week.

This is the biggest job in the world and I’ve never seen a president make it smaller. The president keeps attempting to invent these fake fights because he doesn’t have a record of success or a positive agenda for our country.

House Speaker Rep. John Boehner (R-OH)

America doesn’t have a big man in the Presidency. It doesn’t even have a small man in that office. America, in the person of Barack Obama, has a narcissistic and petulant little boy of few skills, little will, and far less character pretending to be both a man and the POTUS.

Everything Obama does proves that he’s just previously pampered yet unloved child lost in a man’s world who is seeking to shirk and shrink his responsibilities because they are too much for him.

The non-stop campaigning; the constant blaming of others for any and all of his problems; the mendacity with which he speaks; the preference for ruling instead of governing; the claims of unfairness; and the petty tirades and snide responses when called on his failures are all behaviors of a bratty little boy seeking to make his job smaller.

Yes, size matters and America needs a big man to fill the role of President, not a whining little boy of low character like Obama.