Archive for July, 2016

Pokemon Go Bugged?

Posted in Humor, Technology on July 24th, 2016

She can't find them but we canWhere Are The Jigglypuffs?

Hmmm…Is Pokemon Go bugged? Why can she not find those two jigglypuffs when the rest of us can?

😆 That’s the problem with Pokemon Go; it sometimes causes players to ignore both the obvious and their surroundings.

White House Vandalism

Posted in Humor, Politics on July 23rd, 2016

White House VandalWhite House Vandalism

True, insofar as we’ve been allowed to know, there’s no indication that Barack Obama has “tagged” the White House in any way. The closest we have is his and Moochele’s darkening of it public artwork, something that they have every right to do even though it flies in the face of established tradition.

Yet, at the same time, his constant hateful, race-baiting and pro Black Insurrectionist rhetoric has done much to paint the White House in a manner that might as well be called vandalism. Never has anyone filling the role of POTUS injected their own hate and envy filled views into so many situations, both large and small. No resident of the White House has so fouled its hallowed halls.

By His Words Know Him

Posted in Politics on July 22nd, 2016

Know Him By His WordsObama – By His Words Know Him

Lacking a history of actual action, Americans must know Obama by his words and by the people he surrounds himself with. Those two things will have to be enough for Americans and history to know the content of Obama’s character, his loyalties, and his intended legacy.

Hillary’s Nice Response

Posted in 2016 Election, Humor, Politics on July 19th, 2016

Hillary would blame truck makers for Muslim terrorismHillary’s Nice Response

Given that Hillary has already called for lawsuits against firearms and ammunition manufacturers for how individuals chose to use their products, her response to the Muslim terrorist attack in Nice, France would probably be to call for truck manufacturers to be sued.

And she’d probably also declaim that kafir needed to accept and atone for their privilege and listen more to the complaints of the jihadis. 😯

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down. 😉 Your vote counts, whether it’s cast at the polls or from the rooftops.

You Will Rent The Apt

Posted in Politics on July 17th, 2016

If Americans though it was horrific that your business and life could be destroyed for not baking a cake or not printing a tee-shirt that one found offensive was bad, they really need to see where this sort of thing is going and what the Obama Regime is doing.

Forget cakes and tee-shirts for queers. The Obama Regime is demanding that landlords rent the apartment to criminals if those criminals are non-White, especially Black.

Across the United States, African Americans and Hispanics are arrested, convicted and incarcerated at rates disproportionate to their share of the general population. Consequently, criminal records-based barriers to housing are likely to have a disproportionate impact on minority home seekers. While having a criminal record is not a protected characteristic under the Fair Housing Act, criminal history-based restrictions on housing opportunities violate the Act if, without justification, their burden falls more often on renters or other housing market participants of one race or national origin over another (i.e., discriminatory effects liability).

~*~

A housing provider violates the Fair Housing Act when the provider’s policy or practice has an unjustified discriminatory effect, even when the provider had no intent to discriminate. Under this standard, a facially – neutral policy or practice that has a discriminatory effect violates the Act if it is not supported by a legally sufficient justification. Thus, where a policy or practice that restricts access to housing on the basis of criminal history has a disparate impact on individuals of a particular race, national origin, or other protected class, such policy or practice is unlawful under the Fair Housing Act if it is not necessary to serve a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest of the housing provider, or if such interest could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.

Office of General Counsel, HUD

And of course, if the non-White criminal files a discrimination complaint, the landlord or “property provider” is the one who must shoulder the burden and expense of proving that they had a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest in not renting property the non-White criminal, that such interest was neither hypothetical nor speculative, that not renting the property to the non-White criminal in question would achieve that interest, and that not renting the property to the non-White criminal was the only way to achieve that interest.

Yes, in this case as it is in every single case involving “disparate impact,” “discriminatory effect,” and “protected classes” there is a presumption of guilt upon the presumably White defendant – guilty until proven innocent. This is because the accused, if White, is considered guilty not due to his or her actions and motives but because the complainant is non-White and the effect upon the complainant is negative.

To further degrade any hope for true, unbiased justice in these matters, consider the qualifications needed for the landlord’s interests – substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory, and neither hypothetical nor speculative. All of these are completely and utterly subjective. These are metrics decided upon solely so that the government is the final arbiter of what any case’s results will be.

Cracka, you will rent the apartment to that Black or Hispanic thug or you will be destroyed.