Reflections From a Murky Pond

Many of my fellow Americans seem to believe or, at least fervently hope and devoutly pray, that the ongoing, broadening, and deepening scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton’s criminal misuse of email while serving her assignment as Obama’s Secretary of State will be the bomb that blows her and the Democrats chances at the White House to burning, bloody gobbets of Hell-fated meat.

Hillary’s Emails – The Other H-Bomb

Perhaps I’m too cynical, but I believe that bomb is a dud, already defused by the coalition of the Obama Regime and their Lamestream media. Hence, it will little to no bearing upon either Hillary’s preordained status as the Democrats’ 2016 Presidential Nominee or her campaign after to secure the Presidency.

In my opinion, as they say, “The fix is in.” Oh, they’ll let Bernie run a race against Her, but they’re not going to do anything to give him a shot at beating her, especially if it would either disqualify Hillary from holding office or so damage her chances that nominating her would be political suicide.

Occasionally in America, normally due to some instigation by LGBT Social Justice Warriors, the topic of homosexual public displays of affection (PDAs) comes up. Most recently it was due to Hillary Clinton’s queer outreach campaign ad, which made a few ripples in that conversation.

What the topic, conversation, and whining always avoids though is the simple fact that what few complaints are actually made against queer PDAs are almost universally gendered. In other words, while two men lip-locking may well engender derision, two women kissing, even unto the point of some serious snogging, is rarely a cause for complaint.

Simply put, if it’s two women kissing and they’re not butt ugly – and yes, we often complain about butt ugly hetero couples’ PDAs too – we don’t mind. Really! We don’t!

Honestly, the various and sundry complaints that the lesbians make about reactions to their kissing in public are equal parts ridiculous, hilarious, and annoying due to the total fallacy of them.

I’m well past being young and the meme of young women “experimenting” in college long predates me and has rarely raised anything but a titillated eyebrow. And that has expanded to the not particularly ranted against LUGs. Indeed, the socialization and mainstreaming of lesbianism has reached the point where “Barsexuals” are the norm in clubs instead of the rarity worthy of any particular note.

And, as for the pornography industry, sadly almost always a good indicator of what is and/or will be the sexual norm, girl-on-girl was for decades the number sub-genre of porn…until it became so mainstreamed that it largely stopped being a sub-genre and became a de rigueur inclusion in most non-genre specific porn films and videos.

Yeah, the evidence supports the theory that, by and large, we don’t mind seeing two women kiss or, more accurately, we don’t mind it any more than we do a subjectively as attractive heterosexual couple doing so . In a lot of cases, we actively enjoy it.

In a twisted point of fact, the one’s most likely to complain about to women kissing in public are the lesbians. They have a deep-seated problem with women of insufficient “lesbian cred” doing so. Then, lesbians have a long history of despising bisexual women too so their attitude and derision is, at least, consistent with their pathology.

Well, Obama’s starting off 2016 with yet another push for expanding restrictions upon Americans purchasing and owning firearms. This time, in the absence of any cooperation from Congress, he’s going to try it via Executive Orders.

And, of course, the boy’s going to talk, and talk, and talk about it. And, further of course, that talk is going to be filled with a lot of blamecasting and vitriol against supporters of our Constitution’s 2nd Amendment and the GOP in general.

Another Obama Anti-Gun Speech

As bad as any anti-gun rant by Obama is, this one is made that much worse by that pesky memo that was released a few months back that had so many Americans upset. It clearly states, with evidence to back up each point, that no anti-gun measures that could be reasonably enacted – certainly none via Executive Orders – will have any positive effect upon firearm use for illegal violent purposes.

But then, despite whatever Obama jabbers, this isn’t really about reducing any form of firearm-involved violence. This is about Obama pandering to his constituency and making sure that gun control is the hot wedge issue of the day as we go deeper into the 2016 election cycle. And that, my fellow Americans, is what truly makes listening to- or reading a transcript of yet another Obama anti-gun speech so painful to do. The rank, cynical manipulation of the low information Liberal is just grating.