Reflections From a Murky Pond

It’s seems that Disney’s remaking the Original Star Wars trilogy (episodes 4-6). From the look of early, internal promo shots, they’re staying true to form. 😛

Whenever one is faced with a multi-generational conflict, especially an existential one, one is faced with the question of why “nits make lice” – why does the conflict keep going? The answer is easy, especially so in the case of the Gazans. They’re raised to be such and perpetuate the hate. It’s also why there are at this point no true civilians in Gaza. Nits are raised to be lice and they have been for generations.

Yes; sadly the above is reality. It is a scene from an elementary school play in Gaza. Equally sadly and far more maddening is the fact that the pro-Hamas, anti-semites – all of whom happen to be Democrats in the US – scream out about supposed genocide and the murder of children when these nits fall in war.

Nits make lice if they’re raised to do so. Don’t cry when they’re killed off to end the infestation. You should have cried out and stepped in when the previous generation started turning them.

Truly, Star Trek’s Borg are stupid, very stupid. They could “make” Borgs that looked like Seven of Nine but, instead, kept with the hideous cyberzombie esthetic. Really? “Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated!” 😆 Given that it stated that individual Borg are infectious via close contact, it would have been smarter and better to infiltrate Risa and other, similar planets with ones like Seven of Nine – and similar, male counterparts. “Resistance is unanticipated. They were assimilated with a smile.”

And, as an added bit of snark, the whole “throw rocks at them” is an admission that the Feddies were equally stupid. The one form of attack that Borg shields, both personal and ship, couldn’t almost instantly adapt to was simple kinetic energy. Literally, throwing rocks at them at relativistic speeds would have utterly wiped out the Borg Cubes. Yet, not once did the Federation deploy mass drivers, railguns, or any similar weaponry.

Asian beauty standards are somewhat similar to Western beauty standards, but seem more narrowly defined and rigid than what is “required” in the West.” Most Asian cultures require: very pale skin; a heart-shaped face with a narrow chin; double eyelids; a high-bridged, slender nose; mid-sized-to-large breasts. a slim figure with no visible muscle tone; and long, straight hair.

123►

Asian Beauty Standards

Hehe… I’m not going to trouble myself to lie; I think this is an attractive beauty standard, though I’m not overly sold on the slim with no muscle tone part. I do prefer women who are bit more “fit” and/or “robust.” But, it’s still better than the Eurocentric, now largely deprecated – and possibly soon to be illegal, western beauty standard.

Leaving the slim-soft vs. slim-toned personal preference aside, and leaving the pale skin bit aside too, due to this being a normal thing for agrarian and recently agrarian societies, the only issues I have with Asian beauty standards are they’re too rigid – there isn’t really any alternative standards like the US has – and they’re quite unnatural for the Asian phenotype. That unnatural bar, combined with the issue that is Sheng nu (剩女), is something to be derided.

That, by and large, perfectly and heartlessly defines why the Democrat party and its many operatives in schools, the bureaucracy, and their media support transsexualism, especially transwomen. You simply can’t be a man and be a Democrat. At best, you can be a self-loathing pseudo-male which does its best to commit self-harm through sociopolitical action. 😉