Archive for the '2016 Election' Category

Mmmm…RINO Meat

Posted in 2014 Election, 2016 Election, Humor, Politics on August 17th, 2014

RINO Meat
Mmmm…RINO Meat

Oh look! Someone finally found a use for the RINOs befouling American politics. Personally, I can’t think of any better use for them. Well, maybe as a means of testing terminal performance of munitions…but one can in most cases still dress out their carcasses afterwards and sell the meat. ๐Ÿ˜†

Big Brutha Will Speak

Posted in 2014 Election, 2016 Election, Politics on July 19th, 2014

Orwell's Big Brother - Or is that Big Brutha in Obama's case?
B-B! …. B-B! …. B-B! Mmm, Mmm, Mmm! B-B! …. B-B! …. B-B!

Yes. I can easily picture Obama wanting to take over the airwaves and leading his faithful cultists in “Two Minutes Hate.” The boy does bear a resemblance to George Orwell’s Big Brother in 1984, though I suppose, in Obama’s case, we’d have to call him Big Brutha. What I couldn’t picture was his being able to do so…until now.

Now, Obama’s appointees in the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is looking to overhaul the Emergency Alert System so the POTUS can speak to the country at a mere flip of a switch if he feels it’s a national emergency. And, as this is regulation not law, in approximately 30 days this overhaul will happen since the Obama Regime is not known for its bowing to public pressure or comments.

At first glance this seems to be an innocuous addition to Presidential powers. It even, if one doesn’t think too much about it, seems wise and practical to set things up so that, with a push of a button, the POTUS can takeover all of the nations broadcast media in order to speak to the people in the event of any emergency. But what possible emergency could develop that necessitated the POTUS addressing the entirety of the nation with such urgency that he couldn’t abide by- and stay within the normal channels and procedures for doing so? We have successfully navigated two world wars, numerous other armed conflicts, Muslim terrorist attacks, and countless natural disasters and disruptions without any POTUS having to coop the airways by fiat.

And just what would Obama consider a national emergency? As is always the case with any regulations put forth by his appointees in the Executive, it’s left to his discretion. Does the RNC qualify? The Tea Party? Rush Limbaugh? Yet another SCOTUS ruling on Obama’s criminality? Too many States opting out of ObamaCare? Something that Fox News broadcast that Obama doesn’t like and wants to rebut? Will it just be a “comforting” message that he and his are OK in the event of some disaster?

And, what would some future POTUS consider such an emergency to be? Even if Obama doesn’t abuse and misuse this privilege that he’s claiming for himself, it seems far too likely that a future POTUS, possibly as soon as 2016 depending upon who is elected or installed, will do exactly that. Do we, the People really want Big Brother or Big Sister on every TV and radio in the land?

They Can Run On This

Posted in 2010 Election, 2014 Election, 2016 Election on July 16th, 2014

Dems Can Run On ACA
No! Make Them Run On This!

As we begin the planning for the upcoming 2014 midterm elections – and early stage setting for the 2016 Presidential elections – the Democrats are, of course, scrambling for platforms to run upon. My thought is to give them a “hand-out” and provide them with one – ObamaCare and their support thereof.

I think we can run on this. I think there is so much in here that has value to every American, and mostly to people who have insurance.

— David Axelrod
January, 2010

ObamaCare has “worked so well” that we, the People shouldn’t let the Dems run upon it; we should make them run upon it and we can do exactly that if we choose the discussion instead of letting our domestic enemies say whatever they want in order to gain or keep power over us.

Let’s make it 2010 all over again and continue the rebirth of our nation. Then we can impeach and remove Obama, Holder, and many others throughout the Executive and Judicial branches of the Obama Regime.

O-Blivious?

Posted in 2014 Election, 2016 Election, Politics on May 22nd, 2014

If we are to believe Obama and his handlers and overseers, Obama is the most ignorant and sheltered President in America’s history. If we are to believe what his propaganda corps tells us, he’s nigh on completely oblivious to anything that his underlings do.

O-blivious
The O-Blivious POTUS?

Truly, if Americans give Obama the hand-out of credence, he’s better suited to being a member of the Know Nothing Party than of the Democrats. There is, after all, more than passing similarity between the Obama Presidency and that of Millard Fillmore.

As President Fillmore is known only for his bathtub, it seems that Obama may well be best remembered for his television, since the TV seems to be, by his own repeated assertions, the boy’s sole source of information about the actions of his regime.

He Heard About It On the News

Of course, believing what Obama says is a mental disorder that should be included in the next Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) alongside Racial Anxiety Disorder.

While it’s not implausible that Obama is, in effect, a stranger to his own Presidency, it’s much more likely that the boy is knowingly benefiting from plausible deniability. Most likely Obama knows far more of the bad behavior of his regime than he’s admitting and what he doesn’t know is due to his and his handlers and overseers having deliberately set things up so that we wouldn’t know the details.

The boy’s carefully crafted aloof and isolated demeanor coupled with his rhetorical tone certainly created a tenor to his would-be reign that fits this model.

One thing, however, must be remembered – in this, as in every other bit of the Narcissist-in-Chief’s tenure in politics, Obama is neither original nor transformative. The boy has merely expanded upon the behaviors of his predecessors, pushing them down the next step along the entropic curve. Maintaining the POTUS’ plausible deniability has been a growing trend in administrations over the last few decades with President Reagan being notable as the first serious and public uptick in it.

India Is Racist!

Posted in 2014 Election, 2016 Election, Politics on May 19th, 2014

Americans are forced to hear a lot about the purported racism and evils of requiring basic photo identification for voting. With the upcoming 2014 midterm elections and slightly later 2016 elections, Americans are going to be forced to hear a lot more about it because our domestic enemies need to brand the American people and the politicians we support as racists.

The funny thing is that the Liberals like to portray themselves as knowledgeable citizens of the world yet they seem to know very little about the nations of the world…

India Is Racist - They require Voter ID
India Is Racist!

That’s right; the world’s largest democratic republic has used and required Voter ID for some time and, despite the widespread real poverty in India, their voter turnout is comparable to America’s.

Then, the Democrats and those who support and feed off of them aren’t concerned with voting. They’re concerned with the realpolitik of maintaining the slavish support of minorities, especially the “Black Community.” To that end they’ll will always decry anything and everything that Americans desire and/or demand as racist.