Reflections From a Murky Pond

Here’s an uncomfortable and difficult question – If we’re so racist, wasn’t it an act of either rampant evil or gross stupidity to install Barack Obama as POTUS during a time when America and its government absolutely had to pull together?

Put aside your ingrained knee-jerk reaction and actually think about that question for a moment or two or, hopefully, a bit longer.

If America truly is such a racist country and that racism is wholly and solely a “White Problem,” what was anyone thinking by putting a Black man in the White House during a national crisis? If the Liberals, Progressives, and Blacks are right about the American people they had to know that no good would come from such an act, that Obama would accomplish nothing while in office, and that this would further imperil our nation.

If we accept their postulate – though we know the danger of such postulates – that any and all dissent against Obama is because Americans just can’t stand the thought of a Black man as POTUS, then the only question left is whether or not the Liberals, Progressives, and Blacks installed Obama with the full expectation of his being balked at every turn due to racism.

If they knew in their hearts that this would happen, then it was an overt act of evil on their part. It would have to be classed an attempt to destroy America. If, on the other hand, they thought that things wouldn’t go that way and that Obama would be allowed to do whatever he wanted while in office, they were just stupid.

Either way, evil or stupid, if the Liberals, Progressives, and Blacks are right about America being a racist nation, their voting for Obama in 2008 was not done with the best interests of America in mind. That’s something that they really can’t get around or make excuses for.

We, even in this modern age, still perform a lot of animal testing in an attempt to determine the effects of various chemicals upon our health. This outrages many people and, much more importantly, has inherent flaws due to biological differences between species and animals inability to fully explain their symptoms.

Why Are We Still Testing On Animals?

In truth, it does make more sense to use the pedophiles in our prisons as our test subjects for all chemicals and for any experimental medical procedures. We could thereby eliminate a major ongoing source of animal cruelty and advance medical science with little or no cost to society.

Overall, I still prefer taking the police and the woefully pro-criminal courts system out of the equation, but using pedophiles and other vermin in our prison systems as guinea pigs for product testing and medical procedures would, at the very least, allow society to get some use out of these mockeries of human form.

What’s left of them at the end could even be ground up, UV sterilized, and used for fertilizer in marginally arable areas lacking in organic matter in the top soil. Reduce. Reuse. Recycle. 😉

A great and fine American lady, Gov. Sara Palin gave us these words, “Don’t retreat. Reload!”

With our country on a most perilous cusp, these are words for every true son and daughter of America to take to heart and soul and live by lest our domestic enemies choose the course for America’s future – or lack thereof as anything recognizable as being America.

Don’t Retreat. Reload!

Banners and slogans are all right and good. They symbolize movements and crystallize thoughts while bringing people together under a single banner as a unified host who can enact change and exact retribution.

They can’t, however, be merely and solely that if those fine words are to have meaning. Words shouldn’t be empty. They should be the symbol and label of true and repeated action.

So do not simply chant, “Don’t retreat. Reload!” Do it! Live it! Take our country back and do so in a manner that will mean that it’s generations before our enemies can regroup enough to be, once again, an existential threat to our way of life.

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down.

Fashion photographer Terry Richardson, who is as well known for his sexual perversions and predation as for his work, has put a new photo set of the Hollywood’s favorite train wreck, Lindsay Lohan.

Lindsay Lohan Is Such A Tease

Let’s be honest with ourselves, if not with each other; when most of us see these pictures our first thought is, “Pull the trigger!” We might feel guilty over it – I don’t – but we do wish that Lindsay Lohan would suicide to put us out of her misery.

Frankly, it’s sad but true that it seems that the only way society can be freed from the media’s obsession with inundating us with the excruciating details of the failures of these human wreckage is for them to die. Then we just have to suffer through a few weeks of eulogizing these failures and are then left in peace.

In the case the three “D’s” are the disabled, degenerate, and dependent – the three meta-categories of people that no sane member of any society wants to reproduce.

The question is whether or not it’s ethical to encourage them to get sterilized so as to avoid their propagating the vast host of problems such breedings cause society.

Barbara Harris, the founder of Project Prevention – formerly known as C.R.A.C.K. (Children Requiring A Caring Kommunity) – thinks so, specifically when it regards drug addicted women – and a few men. Her organization offer cash incentives for such people to undergo sterilization procedures.

Others think that Harris and Project Prevention are hellish in nature. They claim that she’s taking advantage of women who are not able to make an informed decision about their health. They’ve called what she’s doing bribery. They’ve claimed that she’s taking away these drug addicts’ right to reproduce. And – of course – they’ve brought out the old canard of racism.

The Question Remains

[poll id=”7″]

Personally, I find no ethical problems with offering anyone, especially the mentally disabled, the morally degenerate, and dependent, money if they’re willing to be voluntarily sterilized. I find it a far more efficient and moral choice than Planned Parenthood’s counseling these sorts to have abortions and any form of contraception that requires a regimen of intake is unlikely to be effective for these people.

Is it eugenics? Certainly, of a sort.  I see reason to be bothered by that.  Eugenics, when practiced on a voluntary basis, is no sin insofar as I can see. Killing unborn babies in order to save them from a nightmarish life is another story, as is ignoring their plight.