Reflections From a Murky Pond

So, once again it’s Pride Month. So, once again the queer ass chimera that is the semi-official grouping of all the real and imagined aberrant sexualities will be regularly gathering together in public spaces and pridefully engaging in disturbing practices of public indecency, more and more of which will be aimed specifically at children. Lovely. 🙁

But then, this has to be expected by normal people. The queers’ – and by that I mean those sexual aberrants who are actively part whole of that whole “culture” – have always been about being offensive to normal people in the most garish manners possible.

Queerness isn’t just about who you want to fuck, you know? Being queer is still fundamentally rooted in having a political resistance to hegemonic ideas of how humans ought to be. And it’s about whether or not you’re an ‘acceptable’ human.

— Ass. Prof. Robin Dembroff

Oh yes. This is about the dark and evil side of pridefulness. The ones engaging in the spectacles aren’t just saying that they’re not ashamed of their sexuality; they actively waging a war of sorts against any form of respectability and decency. As they see it, being indecent and actively and publicly offensive to normal people is a core part of being non-heterosexual, i.e., queer. That, of course, course means that, as people become desensitized to their behaviors – or are forced into silence through violence or the threat thereof – these queers will perforce go to further extremes, e.g., the current queer trend towards targeting children. They have to. A pillar of their identity is rebelling against normative acceptability. Hence, they’re in a degenerative feedback loop.

They even proudly proclaim that they’re part of Hamas! Honestly, it’s more than blatantly obvious that the Universities within our nation’s borders are nothing but terrorist indoctrination camps, radicalizing students into a spectrum of anti-American fringes. It’s past time to hold them accountable and treat them the same way we’ve treated foreign terrorist camps.

Bikini Interlude – A Sun-Drenched Edition

I think that most of us can easily agree that sun-drenched bikini babes are one of the better parts of warm weather, especially on or near the coasts.

Cultivating a good morning routine is essential. In these times, this seems to be the best morning routine to adhere to. It’s good for you. It’s good for your family. It’s good for our nation. And, it’s good for the world.

Democrats love their Big Lies, mostly because their entire political platform is founded upon them and the supposed correction of them. But, for this post, I’m going to focus upon the Big Lie of “Banned Books.”

Simply put, barring a very, very few exceptions based upon the content being ruled as fraudulent (The Federal Mafia) or being classified material (Operation Dark Heart), there are no legally banned books in America and haven’t been since the 1971 SCOTUS decision in New York Times Co. v. United States. In point of legal fact, most previously banned books were made available for general publication after 1959, when the SCOTUS in Kingsley Pictures Corp. v. Regents overturned the Federal Anti-Obscenity Act (Comstock Act) of 1873.

No, almost the entire extent of “book banning” in the US is limited to concerned individuals wanting to protect children by keeping certain sorts of reading materials out of our schools. And, this is something that both Americans and Democrats have regularly engaged in for many decades and for fundamentally the same reason – protecting impressionable children from materials that they deem to be damaging to their psyches. It must be said though that Democrats are more likely to remove material from school libraries because of the author rather than the content than Americans are, e.g., many works by Dr. Seuss – even beyond the limited set of his works that could be – in a few cases, quite easily – considered to be “racially insensitive.”

And please, do not be like the Dems and their media and equate challenging a book with successfully banning it. Among both Americans and Democrats there always has been, are, and always will be a minority that challenges the publication and dissemination of various and sundry works. They fail and, even when they seem to succeed at the local level, our court system as quickly as the wheels of law allow reverses that success due to the 1st Amendment.

So, Book Bans are just another Democrat Big Lie.

A Couple Of Additional, Personal Points

I’m just going to add a few bits of my personal opinions on related points to the core of this post, mostly because I don’t feel like doing follow-up posts to cover these tangential specifics.

Ratings & Grade Scales

In my opinion, America needs to “rate” some of these books for age appropriate content. What I’m OK with in elementary school is far more limited than what I’m OK with in middle schools. And, when it comes to high schools, there’s very little in the way of reading materials that I believe should be restricted. Blanket restrictions across all grades, just like blanket approvals, don’t make a lick of sense to me.

Parental Approval

While I’m all for opt-outs and requiring parental approvals, I can’t see how this would be effectively applied to books in school libraries. If the books can be checked out by any kid, they’ll be passed around if their made “forbidden.” All requiring parental approval would do in my opinion is create “cool kids” who got to read these and pass them around for social credit or actual monetary / material profit. The Penthouse magazines that somebody – 😉 – passed around my high school being a possibly extreme example of this.

To Kill A Mockingbird – WTF!

Just as a quick WTF sidenote, Democrats seem to hate and have tried to remove Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mocking Bird from some of their school districts, but Americans have never seemed to have a problem with it.

You’d think, given the anti-American propaganda of the ever-so-woke Left, that it’d be either the other way around or with the Democrats also having no problem with it. Harper Lee’s Pulitzer Prize-winning 1960 novel does, after all, show stereotypical racism from Whites and fits near perfectly with the Democrats’ CRT curricula, since it showed what amounted to systemic racism and a lynch mob mentality. But no; they hate it because of problematical language and racial – that’d be towards Blacks – insensitivity.

Catcher In The Rye

I don’t believe that J. D. Salinger’s 1951 work, Catcher In The Rye should be banned from high schools. I do, however, think it should be removed from all required reading lists and school curricula. I would like to think that that book is despised by both Americans and Democrats as being harmful to minds of teenagers. In fact, I’m pretty sure that having to read and study it has tipped at least one at-risk teenager into serious depression.