Reflections From a Murky Pond

Hillary Loves Abortion

Hillary Clinton absolutely loves abortion and, of course, she is quite strident in her objection to abortion not being showcased in the various Democrat Primary debates.

Clinton got on the topic during the April 14 debate in Brooklyn, N.Y., when she said she would only appoint a Supreme Court justice who believed that Roe vs. Wade is settled law.

“And I want to say something about this since we’re talking about the Supreme Court and what’s at stake. We’ve had eight debates before, this is our ninth,” Clinton said. “We’ve not had one question about a woman’s right to make her own decisions about reproductive health care, not one question.”

~*~

“And we are never asked about this,” she said. “And to be complete in my concern, Sen. Sanders says with respect to Trump it was a distraction. I don’t think it’s a distraction. It goes to the heart of who we are as women, our rights, our autonomy, our ability to make our own decisions, and we need to be talking about that and defending Planned Parenthood from these outrageous attacks.”

Don’t get me wrong; Hillary’s complaint isn’t unexpected. It is core to her reasoning as to why it’s her turn to be POTUS. Of course, given the real nature of Dem politics, it may well be Hillary’s turn as it were, at lest insofar as being the Dems’ Nominee. At least it so far certainly seems as if the DNC already has things “worked out” with Hillary, much like they seemed to have things settled with Obama back in 2008.

What, however, is key is the reason behind Hillary’s love of- and obsession with abortion, since this is the sole basis for her entire political campaign. In her mind all women, but especially Feminist womyn, devolved down to their reproductive organs. Hence, total autonomy for those organs is all she believes matters to them.

Chelsea Defends Her Dad’s Infidelity

In all fairness, Chelsea Clinton has a point about Bill’s rampant and profligate infidelity. Indeed! I think we should give Mr. Clinton more credit than we do. He did sire one child on Hillary, after all, and I could argue that fulfilled his oath in and of itself.

A lot of people on the Left, and some few on the right, make a lot of noise about how Donald Trump is the new Hitler. Trump’s not, of course; he’s not even close to Hitler in agenda or rhetoric.

But, let’s play along with their fantasies as a thought exercise.

If Trump is Hitler, It Is Because Obama Created Weimar America

If Trump is like Hitler, his being so and being the likely Republican nominee for POTUS is, or should be, an expected event that is predicated by Germany’s own history. Obama and the various Congressional Democrats, along with their ever-angry constituency have created Weimar America. Hence, the rise of someone to fill Hitler’s to bring it to an end and “make the nation great again” was almost a foregone conclusion.

Trump and Trump’s power and popularity exists now because Obama & Co. is responsible for letting a condition develop in this country which created a climate that brought seeds up out of the ground with vegetation on the end of them looking like something his people never dreamed of except in their nightmares.

Of Course, You’ll Never Convince The SJWs Of That

Not that is at all possible to convince the Liberals, Progressives, and their various minority tenants of this fact. These Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) have been too well indoctrinated for too long by certain sorts who see a personal advantage in a fundamentally changed and weakened America for them to be deprogrammed at this point.

Worse though than their woeful indoctrination is that sad fact that these SJWs are so weak and pathetic that they truly equate Trump with Hitler. They have all been from birth given so much and had so little expected of them that they actually see and refusal to give them more or expect more from them as oppression on the scale of Nazi Germany.

So to them Trump is Hitler, even though he is actually closer to being a reflection of someone dear to their hearts and minds.

Trump Is Americans’ Obama

Yes, Trump is not Hitler; Trump is Americans’ Obama, which is unsurprising given the fact that the Obama Regime inadvertently created him as an overt political force. Just turn Obama on his head and change his color – it always has to come down to color with the Left, never character or its lack – and you have Donald Trump.

Trump, just like Obama before him, is a demagogue with grand and resonating rhetoric and equally grand promises and populist appeal. The only difference is the populace he resonated with. Also, much as Obama, Trump’s rhetoric and promises aren’t too well grounded in reality or what is possible for a POTUS to accomplish.

Truthfully, I’m not sure how I feel about this. I’m not a great fan of demagogues as so few have the substance or intent to fulfill their promises. Yet, I cannot deny the importance to Americans seeing a candidate that looks and sounds like them and who speaks what they the speak. If nothing else, Trump is a needed message to America’s domestic enemies that we will not go gently and meekly into the night.

Following last Tuesdays morning’s Muslim terrorist attacks in Brussels, Belgium that left at least 30 dead and 230 more injured, Hillary Clinton released a statement assuring her version solidarity with the Belgians.

Terrorists have once again struck at the heart of Europe, but their campaign of hate and fear will not succeed. The people of Brussels, of Europe, and of the world will not be intimidated by these vicious killers. Today Americans stand in solidarity with our European allies. Our thoughts and prayers are with the families of those killed and wounded, and all the people of Belgium. These terrorists seek to undermine the democratic values that are the foundation of our alliance and our way of life, but they will never succeed. Today’s attacks will only strengthen our resolve to stand together as allies and defeat terrorism and radical jihadism around the world.

— Hillary Clinton

Perhaps Hillary – to show cooperation with Europe of course – will confer with Germany’s Angela Merkel who has such a overwhelming success rate with dealing with Jihad.

How Can We Blame This On White Conservatives?

And make no mistake about it; the above image, while sarcastic, is also factual. Hillary’s on statement was a vow to do nothing to reduce the chances or scope of future attacks by Jihadis anywhere in the Civilized World. It may have been couched in high-minded seeming rhetoric but it was in fact an avowal of acceptance.

Clinton, like the preponderance of America’s Leftist enemies, both foreign and domestic, views Muslim terrorist attacks upon the West as a form of the Jizya that we must pay Muslim…because we’re racist, bigotted, and Islamophobic.

There’s a whole lot of what we’re forced to call “people” piling on Donald Trump and blaming him for the non-Whites and Liberals who’ve repeatedly turned to violence against him and his supporters. Essentially, they say he was asking for it.

There’s politicians doing it:

The ugly, divisive rhetoric we are hearing from Donald Trump and the encouragement of violence and aggression is wrong, and it’s dangerous. If you play with matches, you’re going to start a fire you can’t control.

That’s not leadership. That’s political arson.

— Hillary Clinton

~*~

I would appeal to for every candidate is decency and civility, that we can disagree and disagree forcefully while still respecting each other and not engaging in insults and vulgarity and not encouraging violence.

— Ted Cruz

~*~

You wonder if we’re headed in a different direction today where we’re no longer capable of having differences of opinion but in fact now protests become a license to take up violence and take on your opponents physically. This is what happens when a leading presidential candidate goes around feeding into a narrative of bitterness and anger and frustration.

— Marco Rubio

 

And then there’s the Lamestream Media.

Anybody who tells you that there is no connection between the behavior of the mob at these events and the behavior of the man at the podium leading the mob at these events is not actually watching he’s been saying from the podium. What he has been saying, and the way he has been egging it on, it has been escalating

— Rachel Maddow

~*~

[sic] … a political campaign whose security has been so stifling as to draw angry comparisons to fascist regimes would plan a key rally for Trump in the middle of a racially diverse urban campus.

— Joe Scarborough

Someone care to tell me who, with the exceptions that Mr. Trump is a White and a man, how this is any different from blaming a woman who was drunk or dressed “provocatively” for her own rape? Asking for it is asking for it, after all.

Of course, this question has to be put to the Liberals and Progressives. The non-Whites in these times have a different definition of rape and their behavior vis-a-vis Mr. Trump adheres to that logic.