Archive for April, 2010

Synopsis of SB 1070

Posted in Politics on April 27th, 2010

Arizona’s Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (SB 1070) requires through force of state laws that officials and agencies of the state and political subdivisions fully comply with and assist in the enforcement of federal immigration laws and gives county attorneys subpoena power in certain investigations of employers. By and large it does this by making much of the federal code pertaining to illegal immigration part of Arizona state legal code, thereby bypassing jurisdictional issues.

Provisions of SB 1070

Enforcement

  1. Requires a reasonable attempt to be made to determine the immigration status of a person during any legitimate contact made by an official or agency of the state or a county, city, town or political subdivision (political subdivision) if reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the U.S.
  2. Requires the person’s immigration status to be verified with the federal government pursuant to federal law.
  3. Requires an alien unlawfully present in the U.S. who is convicted of a violation of state or local law to be transferred immediately to the custody of ICE or Customs and Border Protection, on discharge from imprisonment or assessment of any fine that is imposed.
  4. Allows a law enforcement agency to securely transport an alien who is unlawfully present in the U.S. and who is in the agency’s custody to:
    1. a federal facility in this state or
    2. any other point of transfer into federal custody that is outside the jurisdiction of the law enforcement agency.
  5. Allows a law enforcement officer, without a warrant, to arrest a person if the officer has probable cause to believe that the person has committed any public offense that makes the person removable from the U.S.
  6. Prohibits officials or agencies of the state and political subdivisions from being prevented or restricted from sending, receiving or maintaining an individual’s immigration status information or exchanging that information with any other governmental entity for the following official purposes:
    1. determining eligibility for any public benefit, service or license provided by any federal, state, local or other political subdivision of this state;
    2. verifying any claim of residence or domicile if that verification is required under state law or a judicial order issued pursuant to a civil or criminal proceeding in the state;
    3. confirming a detainee’s identity; and
    4. if the person is an alien, determining whether the person is in compliance with federal alien registration laws.
  7. Disallows officials or agencies of the state or political subdivisions from adopting or implementing policies that limit immigration enforcement to less than the full extent permitted by federal law, and allows a person to bring an action in superior court to challenge an official or agency that does so.
  8. Requires the court, if there is a judicial finding that an entity has committed a violation, to order any of the following:
    1. that the plaintiff recover court costs and attorney fees;
    2. that the defendant pay a civil penalty of not less than $1,000 and not more than $5,000 for each day that the policy has remained in effect after the filing of the action.
  9. Requires the court to collect and remit the civil penalty to the Department of Public Safety (DPS), which must establish a special subaccount for the monies in the account established for the Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement Mission (GIITEM) appropriation.
  10. Specifies that law enforcement officers are indemnified by their agencies against reasonable costs and expenses, including attorney fees, incurred by the officer in connection with any action, suit or proceeding brought pursuant to this statute to which the officer may be a party by reason of the officer being or having been a member of the law enforcement agency, except in relation to matters in which the officer is adjudged to have acted in bad faith.

Trespassing by Illegal Aliens

  1. Specifies that, in addition to any violation of federal law, a person is guilty of trespassing if the person is:
    1. present on any public or private land in the state and
    2. is not carrying his or her alien registration card or has willfully failed to register.
  2. Requires, in the enforcement of this statute, the final determination of an alien’s immigration status to be determined by:
    1. a law enforcement officer who is authorized to verify or ascertain an alien’s immigration status or
    2. a law enforcement officer or agency communicating with ICE or the U.S. Border Protection.
  3. Stipulates that a person is not eligible for suspension or commutation of sentence or release on any basis until the sentence imposed is served.
  4. Directs the person to pay jail costs and an additional assessment of at least $500 for the first violation or at least $1,000 for subsequent offenses.
  5. Requires the court to collect and remit the assessments to DPS for the special GIITEM subaccount.
  6. Specifies that the trespassing statute does not apply to a person who maintains authorization from the federal government to remain in the U.S.
  7. Classifies the violation as follows:
    1. a class 2 felony if the person commits the violation while in possession of a dangerous drug, precursor chemicals used in the manufacturing of methamphetamine, a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument or property that is used for committing an act of terrorism;
    2. a class 4 felony for a second or subsequent offense or if the person, within 60 months before the violation, accepted a voluntary removal from the U.S. or has been deported;
    3. a class 1 misdemeanor in all other cases.

Unlawful Stopping and Solicitation of Work

  1. Specifies that it is unlawful, if a motor vehicle is stopped on a street, roadway or highway and blocks or impedes the normal movement of traffic:
    1. for a motor vehicle occupant to attempt to hire or hire and pick up passengers for work at a different location;
    2. for a person to enter the motor vehicle in order to be hired by a motor vehicle occupant and to be transported to work at a different location.
  2. Stipulates that it is unlawful for a person who is unlawfully present in the U.S. and who is an unauthorized alien to knowingly apply for work, solicit work in a public place or perform work as an employee or independent contractor in Arizona.
  3. Classifies these offenses as class 1 misdemeanors.

Unlawful Transporting

  1. Specifies that it is unlawful for a person to do or attempt to do the following if the person knows or recklessly disregards the fact that the alien has come to, has entered or remains in the U.S. in violation of law:
    1. transport or move an alien in Arizona in a means of transportation;
    2. conceal, harbor or shield an alien from detection in any place in Arizona, including any building or means of transportation.
  2. Stipulates it is unlawful to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in Arizona if the person knows or recklessly disregards the fact that such coming to, entering or residing in this state is or will be in violation of law.
  3. Subjects a means of transportation used in the commission of a violation to mandatory vehicle immobilization or impoundment.
  4. Classifies these offenses as class 1 misdemeanors and subjects offenders to fines of at least $1,000, except that a violation that involves 10 or more illegal aliens is a class 6 felony with a fine of at least $1,000 for each alien who is involved.

Investigations of Employers

  1. Allows the county attorney, in investigations of employers who are alleged to have knowingly or intentionally hired unauthorized aliens, to take evidence, administer oaths or affirmations, issue subpoenas requiring attendance and testimony of witnesses and cause depositions to be taken.
  2. Exempts proceedings held during the course of a confidential investigation from open meeting laws.
  3. Stipulates that an employer is not entrapped in an investigation if the employer was predisposed to knowingly or intentionally employ an unauthorized alien and law enforcement officers or their agents merely provided the employer with an opportunity to do so.
  4. States that it is not entrapment for law enforcement officers or their agents merely to use a ruse or to conceal their identities.
  5. Directs employers to keep verification records of their employees’ work eligibility through E-Verify.
  6. Establishes a class 3 felony for failing to:
    1. verify employment eligibility through E-Verify or
    2. keep records of verifications.

This is only a brief synopsis of Arizona’s SB 1070. The full text of the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act is available in PDF format from the Arizona State Legislature.

Related Reading:

Immigration and Refugee Law and Policy (University Casebook Series)
Black's Law Dictionary, 10th Edition
Law School Confidential: A Complete Guide to the Law School Experience: By Students, for Students
Crime and Punishment
Scalia Speaks: Reflections on Law, Faith, and Life Well Lived

Defense Mechanisms

Posted in Humor, Politics on April 26th, 2010

All of the Gods’ creatures have some form of natural defense mechanism to protect themselves from predators, antagonists, and competitors.

Threatened Critters And Their Defense Mechanisms - Some are more disgusting than others
Threatened Critters And Their Natural Defense Mechanisms

Of course not all such defenses are equal; they vary considerably in disgustingness and efficacy. 😉

Related Reading:

Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America
Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity
What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions
The Cartoon Guide to Physics (Cartoon Guide Series)
You Can't Make This Stuff Up: Ridiculously Funny Stories by Real Cops

A Fine Reprisal (NSFW)

Posted in Humor, Politics, Religion, Society on April 24th, 2010

It seems that Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi’s recent screed about how women not wearing the hijab, jilbab, and abaya causes disasters such as earthquakes resonated poorly with many women in the Civilized World. One of these outraged women, Jennifer McCreight, a double major in genetics and evolution at Purdue University, has come up with a fine test of the Islamist’s theory and an equally fine reprisal against him and his misogynistic prudery. She calls it Boobquake.

Boobquake! April 27, 2010 Flaunt It For ScienceOn Monday, April 26, 2010, Ms. McCreight and tens of thousands of other women have pledged to put Sedighi’s claims to the test. They will wear their most cleavage revealing tops – alternately their shortest skirts, dresses, or shorts in the case of some of the bootylicious attendees – and see if doing so causes an earthquake.

From the Journal & Courier:

A Purdue University student is asking women around the world Monday to show a little cleavage, or some short shorts, as a humorous test to disprove an Iranian cleric’s theory that immodest dress has the power to make the Earth shake.

She calls it “boobquake,” and it has become an Internet and international sensation in just a few days.

Jennifer McCreight, a double major in genetics and evolution, was incredulous when she read news reports Monday that Iranian cleric Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi said promiscuous women were responsible for earthquakes.

This seems to me to be a wonderful idea. Not only is it a stinging reprisal against Sedighi’s – and Islam’s – attitude about the form and flesh of women, it’s an interesting method of scientifically testing and refuting the Islamist’s claims.

In The Name Of Science, I Offer My Boobs

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Or Delight?

This is definitely the sort of protest and science experiment that I want to observe because, even if it’s ineffective, it’s still a beautiful thing. However, while the above women suit my tastes in cleavage displays, Ms. McCreight’s sensitivities and preferences are somewhat different.

I also hate the ideal of “big boobs are always better!” The cleavage joke was just a result of me personally having cleavage, and that being my choice of immodesty. And I thought “boobquake” just sounded funny.

— Jennifer McCreight
A quick clarification about Boobquake

And Ms. McCreight has a solid point in her opinion. Bigger is not always better, or at least not a hard and fast necessity for beauty or sexiness. Certainly not being particularly busty is no barrier at all to displaying the sort of immodesty that Ms. McCreight needs for he study and that the Islamists hate and fear so much.

Smaller Caliber Weapons

Much as I said to the women of Iran in an earlier post, let the beauty of your flesh, the flash of your eyes, and promise of your hips set the very earth to quivering with joy. 😉

Related Reading:

The Breast
Raquel: Beyond the Cleavage
Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)
Iran: What Everyone Needs to Know