Want To Slow Global Warming? Stop Immigration!

If both everything and only that which the Warmists claim were true, then this video would be, by and large, true. Halting or greatly reducing and restricting immigration to America from the Third World would slow the rate of Anthropogenic Climate Change.

The Truth

It’s grim and scary fact that the US Census Bureau’s middle and most likely projection is that the US will add 120 million people to the population of the U.S. by 2050 and that 67% of this population explosion will be due to immigration and the progeny of immigrants.

Each and every one of those immigrants and their broods are going to expect to live somewhat akin as to how Americans live, an admittedly wildly resource consuming lifestyle. The slightly over 80 million immigrants and children of immigrants will require America to produce, expend, and/or consume:

• 28 million more housing units
• 37 million more passenger automobiles
• 1.9 billion more barrels of oil per year
• 4.4 quadrillion gallons of water per year

Even to the majority of people, those who haven’t bought into Al Gore’s doomsday cult of AGW, have to see that these numbers are not sustainable. If the US Census Bureau’s projections are close to accurate, America  has a future measured in years and not very many of those.

The Stupidity

Whether true or not, this video and the intent behind it is stupid. It’s farcical to think for a moment that Greens, Liberals, and Progressives who make up the Warmists would ever entertain any thought that was not expressly and  actively pro-immigration and/or pro-minority. Those sorts would never consider advocating such things as limiting immigration from Third World areas.

Irrespective of whatever they’ve ever stated about the problem of Global Warming, their chosen solutions have always had far more to do with wealth distribution than with combating Climate Change.

At the most fundamental level, if that wasn’t the case, then they wouldn’t have mono-focused on CO2 emissions from fossil fuels. They would have also looked at CO2 emission levels from biofuel / biomass production and that of charcoal, which is a primary fuel for much of the Third World. They also might have – still adhering to their postulate of Anthropogenic Global Warming  of course – done some serious research into the climatic effects of the levels of deforestation both these processes cause.

But such things are not and never will be part of any Green’s, Liberal’s, or Progressives’ agenda. No matter what their current cause célèbre is, their “solutions” are all the same and do not include anything resembling the ideas in this video.

It’s stupid to believe that the Green’s, Liberal’s, or Progressives’ have the capability or will to understand or to change their ways.

In BP’s defense, however, there have been far worse, more damaging, and just plain more disgusting things to pollute the world’s oceans than a mere few million barrels of crude oil.

No! We’ll Never Get The Taste Outta The Water Now!

Of course, in Amy Winehouse’s case, while she would probably be as detrimental to the Gulf’s shrimp population as the oil spill, she’d probably add to the crabs population.

What is most telling is not that the Left is outraged but what specifically they’re outraged over in this matter.

What should be able to be considered strangely, the issue isn’t with Prof. Katz’s admitted lack of usefulness in dealing with the spill or its cleanup.

I was honored to be invited and enjoyed the experience. Did I have anything much to contribute? I think I have some ideas for how to prevent this kind of thing from happening in the future, but I don’t have anything very specific to offer on the present problems. It is very much in the hands of the real pros.

– Professor Jonathan I. Katz
St. Louis Beacon Interview

If Prof. Katz’ lack of qualifications to deal with British Petroleum’s catastrophic failure was the reason for the Liberal’s outrage I would take no issue with it. From the above quote I would guess that Prof. Katz himself would not gainsay their opinions. But the Liberals’ wrath and condemnation is not about Katz’s credentials or skills; it’s about his ideology and the fact that it doesn’t match their own.

Firstly, Prof. Katz doesn’t believe in Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) – desperately re-branded as ‘Climate Change” – any more than the majority of American people do. Nor is he overly fond of self-aggrandizing opportunists like Al Gore and his cult-like followers.

Who is stoking the alarm about global warming? There is Al Gore, an over-the-hill politician who wants to remain in the public eye. His house uses 20 times as much electricity as the average American house and he flies private jets. Obviously, he does not believe what he preaches; it must be an act. Conservation is for the little people. I’ll think about reducing my emissions after he reduces his by 95%. Then there is Jim Hansen, would-be dictator who wants to throw in jail anyone who disagrees with him or burns coal. He may wish himself another Mussolini (or worse), but people just laugh at him. And finally John Holdren, who in his younger days was prophesying disaster from the ice age then just beginning (so he said). Fictitious crises are a demagogue’s route to power.

Some of the more apocalyptic fears about global warming resemble a secular doomsday cult. Rather than God dooming mankind for its traditional sins (robbery, lust, murder, disbelief, etc.), Nature is said to doom mankind for the secular sin of carbon emission. Some (Greenpeace, and even more radical groups) think any human effect on nature to be sinful, and regard “Mother Earth” as a deity that is violated by any use of its resources for the sustenance, comfort or betterment of Mankind. Needless to say, this is opposite to the Biblical grant of the natural world to Man for his benefit.

– Professor Jonathan I. Katz
September 11, 2009
Cold Thoughts on Global Warming

Secondly, more irrelevantly to rationally minded people, but apparently much more importantly to the Liberals Prof. Katz does not in any way approve of homosexuality. He is, in fact, a self professed homophobe and seemingly proud of that fact.

In America attitudes towards homosexuality changed in the 1970′s. It went from a private, furtively practiced, vice to an open and accepted subculture. In many circles, “sodomite” ceased to be an insult. This acceptance led to the toleration, and wide practice, of gross homosexual promiscuity. HIV, falling onto that fertile soil, made the AIDS epidemic. Even before AIDS was recognized, practicing homosexuals were notorious for a high rate of venereal diseases.

The religious believer may see the hand of God, but both he and the rationalist must see a fact of Nature. The human body was not designed to share hypodermic needles, it was not designed to be promiscuous, and it was not designed to engage in homosexual acts. Engaging in such behavior is like riding a motorcycle on an icy road without a helmet. It may be possible to get away with it for a while, and a few misguided souls may get a thrill out of doing so, but sooner or later (probably sooner) the consequences will be catastrophic. Lethal diseases spread rapidly among people who do such things.

Unfortunately, the victims are not only those whose reckless behavior brought death on themselves. There are many completely innocent victims, too: hemophiliacs (a substantial fraction died as a result of contaminated clotting factor), recipients of contaminated transfusions, and their spouses and children, for AIDS can be transmitted heterosexually (in America, only infrequently) and congenitally. The icy road was lined with unsuspecting innocents, who never chose to ride a motorcycle. Guilt for their deaths is on the hands of the homosexuals and intravenous drug abusers who poisoned the blood supply. These people died so the sodomites could feel good about themselves.

– Professor Jonathan I. Katz
May 13, 1999
In Defense of Homophobia

The Liberals absolutely couldn’t stand that Prof. Katz was included in President Obama’s scientific team sent to the Gulf solely because he isn’t a Warmist but is a homophobe. It is beyond their limited rationality to see that these two facts about Prof. Katz are utterly irrelevant to whether or not he could help solve a complex applied engineering problem such as we currently face in the wake of the oil rig explosion.

All these raving and ranting fools could see was that Prof. Katz wasn’t someone who agreed with their ideology and who “should not be elevated by the President of the United States as a representative of the best minds in America” according to the queers at AmericaBlog.

What’s truly sickening is that they won.  President Obama’s administration kowtowed before the stridency of the Warmists and queers.

Some of Professor Katz’s controversial writings have become a distraction from the critical work of addressing the oil spill. Professor Katz will no longer be involved in the Department’s efforts.

– DOE Spokesman Stephanie Mueller
May 17, 2010
Sirius OutQ News

Don’t get me wrong; I don’t believe that Prof. Katz is any great loss to President Obama’s “dream team” of scientists. Neither he nor I think he could have added much benefit to the enterprise. But what if he could have?

Little, if any, of the complaints from the Left have mentioned Katz’s usefulness or lack of it in the efforts to stem the flood of crude oil pouring into the Gulf from the remains of BP’s oil platform. Liberals, especially the Warmists and queers, don’t sound like they’d care if Katz was critical to the mission at hand; they’d still do their best to have him removed based upon ideology and ideology alone.

I don’t care if you’re a vegan, cross-dressing, queer, communist, warmist who blames the US for 9/11; in an emergency unrelated to your beliefs,  if you have skills I need, I’ll gladly work with you.

To Liberals, only ideology matters and they have shown that they’ll take this to dangerously destructive lengths. This is why Americans must break them and destroy them as a political and social force.

The Trail of Filth – What Illegal Aliens Leave In Their Wake

Estimates on the number of illegal immigrants who sneak into America from Mexico across Arizona’s border vary wildly. A conservative-to-moderate range would be 100,000 – 250,000 illegals enter the US through Arizona’s southern border per year. Each and every one of these invaders wreaks environmental damage upon our lands during its treks.

Extrapolating from San Diego State University’s study of the environmental damage cause by illegal passing through the Cleveland National Forest, in eastern San Diego County, California we can quantify this damage in the following ways based upon the estimate of 100K – 250K illegal immigrants per annum:

• Illegal immigrants blaze 48 – 72 miles of new trails
• Illegal immigrants disturb 16 – 24 acres of wildness habitat
• Illegal immigrants leave 5.5 – 8.25 tons of trash
• Illegal immigrants light 1,100 – 1,650 illegal campfires
• Illegal immigrants burn 420 – 630 acres of land by starting wildfires

That’s a significantly horrendous level of ecological damage and would normally have the Liberals outraged at the perpetrators, especially since the more arid regions of the planet have more delicate biospheres and a very vulnerable to such depredations. It’s not one, however, that is going to receive much attention unless the Liberals, always and often laudably at the forefront of environmental causes, get involved.

Unfortunately for Americans and the ecosystems of southern Arizona – frankly the ecosystems of our border states et al – the Liberals, by and large but presumably with a few exceptions, are not outraged at foreigners – especially non-Whites – who commit environmental crimes.  Those sorts of polluters do not seem to bother the Liberals.

The Liberals, whenever vaguely possible,  instead prefer to either turn an blind eye to the problem or make excuses for the non-White invaders and attempt, as always, to shift both blame and responsibility to Americans, primarily White Americans.

So we are left with a mess. Arizona has a dangerous and filthy problem – illegal immigrants, and the best source of action and awareness against the problem, the Liberals,  has conflicting priorities based upon racial politics.

If they manage to pass some variant of the traitors, Rep. Henry Waxman’s (D-CA) and Rep. Edward Markey’s American Clean Energy Security Act, America’s economy – especially at the average consumer level – is going to be horribly harmed, possibly beyond the point of recovery.

That is the point of their exercise and to be expected; you can’t “fundamentally change“ America without first destroying all that it is.

But President Obama’s and his Liberals’ Cap & Trade scheme, like almost all man-caused disasters, would not be without its humorous side.

Do You Have A Permit For Those Emissions, Buster?

Can’t you just picture this happening? The insectile mindlessness and regimen of the average bureaucrat and their enforcers combined with the hubris and narcissism of Obama’s regime makes such a ludicrous scenario almost assured.

After all, if one is beset by such arrogance that one believes that he can fundamentally change the very planet Earth, it’s a small step to deciding to regulate it.

Let us all for a moment put aside our pride and hubris and look at the Earth and the stark, raw power She can bring to bear at any given moment.

April 19, 2010 Eyjafjallajökull Volcano Erupting

Nothing short of our profligate use of our arsenal of nuclear weapons could hope to match the power and destructive force of the recent eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, which was a small and relatively mild volcanic eruption.

So when you hear people ranting or whining about Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) or how the Civilized World has caused massive and apocalyptic Climate Change via our CO2 emissions over the last handful of decades think about this picture and recognize that all of this hype is predicated upon people’s pride and hubris.

Love the Earth for she is fair and perilous beyond all of our means to measure. Just don’t delude yourself – or be deluded by other’s vanity or cynical manipulations – into being so confident that mankind can so easily fundamentally change Her so easily.

I Love The Smell Of Napalm In The Morning;
It Smells Like … French Fries?

This will, of course, have some largely unexpected and probably disturbing consequences.

~*~

H/T to Attack Cartoons from whence I shamelessly stole this cartoon.

Macro photographer Miroslaw Swietek was wise enough to find these sleeping jewels and capture their beauty and we’re lucky enough that he shared the images with the world.

Of course, as the above image displays, Al Gore hopefully wouldn’t be the first choice by the Warmists for a PETA style AGW poster or billboard.

Obama – Planning The Next Warmist Gathering

Yeah, having some of the coldest weather in recorded history and a blizzard hamper the Warmists’ Conference of the Parties (COP 15) didn’t bode well for public acceptance of their agenda.

That probably has something to do with why the sixteenth Conference of the Parties (COP) under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is to b held in balmy Mexico this year.