You are perhaps right about my response to uG melsoM A tsuJ, but I see little point left in engaging them in dialog. Words are not what is going to solve for the problem that they present to the world.

very well written and you demonstrate a good knowledge of the legalisms of Islam. I do think you could have cut yuG melsoM A tsuJ a break, though. A muslim trying to have a fair dialogue may be a good target for an intellectual conversation about the evils of his faith, and perhaps a covert to reason.

But, I do like the picture of Mohammad (shit upon him) and Aisha.

Rick

As for your pedophile prophet – To the pit of Hell with it and its diseased ravings.

Simply put, the ball is in the Muslims’ court. They can either ameliorate their ways or they can suffer for them.

But please, please, do never state that Islam is like that–the people may be, but the teachings of Qur’an are not.

And please do not insult our Prophet or anyone else since it is not deliberately just. Yes, I’m referring to the picture that you posted.

What such thing has contribute to our world is just hatred and provocations that leads to war.

With no intention of hatred, just a sincere request to pity me for the least, and to pity my religion for benevolence.

~yuG melsoM A tsuJ~

That’s actually ironically funny – a Sunni Muslim complaining about the Shiite Muslims’ practice of Nikah Mut‘ah when the Sunnis have Nikah Misyar, which is close enough to mutaa to make no difference to anyone but a legalistic fool – or a Sunni trying to pretend it’s better than a Shiite.

I’ll clue you in; I’m kafir harbi – not even dhimmi – and you Muslims are all the same as far as I’m concerned. You’re all just malformed vermin that should be exterminated for the sake of public health and a better smelling planet.

Mutah is totally forbidden (haram) in Islam and is considered prostitution which is not at all a part of Islam. Read about Mutah here:
http://www.ahlelbayt.com/articles/mutah/mutah-is-haram

In occupied countries, thousands of women facing reprisals because they were in relationships with German soldiers (invaders) and had gotten pregnant, didn’t have many alternatives other than the Lebensborn.

It was sort of a breeding program though. While nobody was forced to have sex with any specific partners, the program was only available to people who met medical selections that applied eugenic and “race” criteria.

The Germans encouraged this as well to my knowledge while the Nazi’s were in power.

It doesn’t matter which religion, there seems to be a general consensus when a “need” arises, faith is compromised.

In other words, there’s no “liberalization” going on here because Shiites have been doing it for ages. Now, if it were Sunnis doing it, especially Wahhabists, that be exactly what you were describing and would likely reach the results you posit.