<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Small Victory?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/one-small-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/one-small-victory/</link>
	<description>The eclectic ramblings of jonolan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Infanticide Loophole &#124; Reflections From a Murky Pond</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/one-small-victory/#comment-13701</link>
		<dc:creator>Infanticide Loophole &#124; Reflections From a Murky Pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonolan.net/?p=13387#comment-13701</guid>
		<description>[...] baby killers on the Left have already taken steps to ensure that, even if some version Stupak&#8217;s amendment is included in the monstrosity of ObamaCare&#8217;s Health Insurance Reconstruction, the public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] baby killers on the Left have already taken steps to ensure that, even if some version Stupak&#8217;s amendment is included in the monstrosity of ObamaCare&#8217;s Health Insurance Reconstruction, the public [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Baby Killer Lies &#124; Reflections From a Murky Pond</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/one-small-victory/#comment-13061</link>
		<dc:creator>The Baby Killer Lies &#124; Reflections From a Murky Pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonolan.net/?p=13387#comment-13061</guid>
		<description>[...] Adviser David Axelrod said that President Obama will &#8220;intervene&#8221; to ensure that the Stupak Amendment is stripped from any Health Insurance Reconstruction bill that makes it through [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adviser David Axelrod said that President Obama will &#8220;intervene&#8221; to ensure that the Stupak Amendment is stripped from any Health Insurance Reconstruction bill that makes it through [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonolan</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/one-small-victory/#comment-12997</link>
		<dc:creator>jonolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonolan.net/?p=13387#comment-12997</guid>
		<description>kissmymango,

Yawn. If you&#039;re going to attempt to rant at least show some facility for it. Otherwise you just show yourself to be yet another worthless fool.

Better yet, try putting whatever legal training you&#039;ve undoubtedly acquired to some use and review the legislation in question and that of the Hyde Amendment. Perhaps, then you could tell me why you are so pathetically upset even though the Stupak Amendment merely prevents the abortionist from circumventing Hyde.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kissmymango,</p>
<p>Yawn. If you&#8217;re going to attempt to rant at least show some facility for it. Otherwise you just show yourself to be yet another worthless fool.</p>
<p>Better yet, try putting whatever legal training you&#8217;ve undoubtedly acquired to some use and review the legislation in question and that of the Hyde Amendment. Perhaps, then you could tell me why you are so pathetically upset even though the Stupak Amendment merely prevents the abortionist from circumventing Hyde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kissmymango</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/one-small-victory/#comment-12996</link>
		<dc:creator>kissmymango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonolan.net/?p=13387#comment-12996</guid>
		<description>I say we just jail women who get abortions. I mean, they&#039;re murderers, right?  Even the ones whose baby died in utero and she was forced to have it removed- murderer! And women who miscarry too. You know those bitches just did it on purpose.  And, I say we force everyone to provide organs to those in need on demand and at their own expense.  If you don&#039;t you&#039;re a murderer just like an abortionist.   Except men, cuz their bodies are all sacred n shit. but women - they should have &quot;for rent&quot; signs tatooed on their stomachs. That way they can&#039;t ever say &quot;but I don&#039;t want to be pregnant/give up my kidney&quot; - bitches are the publics vending machines.  They should do what we tell them to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say we just jail women who get abortions. I mean, they&#8217;re murderers, right?  Even the ones whose baby died in utero and she was forced to have it removed- murderer! And women who miscarry too. You know those bitches just did it on purpose.  And, I say we force everyone to provide organs to those in need on demand and at their own expense.  If you don&#8217;t you&#8217;re a murderer just like an abortionist.   Except men, cuz their bodies are all sacred n shit. but women &#8211; they should have &#8220;for rent&#8221; signs tatooed on their stomachs. That way they can&#8217;t ever say &#8220;but I don&#8217;t want to be pregnant/give up my kidney&#8221; &#8211; bitches are the publics vending machines.  They should do what we tell them to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonolan</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/one-small-victory/#comment-12994</link>
		<dc:creator>jonolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonolan.net/?p=13387#comment-12994</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;What I find really sick and astonishingly stupid in the Bill is having a separate Insurance provider for abortions!&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

OK. What I find really sick and astonishingly wrong is the Liberals trying to circumvent the Hyde Amendment so that my tax dollars will be spent by the federal government on subsidizing abortion on-demand.

That&#039;s the catch. You have to separate out elective abortions from medical procedures, or not provide federal funds for insurance premiums; otherwise you violate the Hyde Amendment and the sensibilities of a lot of Americans.

As for the supposed forced consumerism, as long as there&#039;s a &quot;Public Option,&quot; this is just an attempt to nationalize health insurance over the next decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;What I find really sick and astonishingly stupid in the Bill is having a separate Insurance provider for abortions!&#8221;</em></p>
<p>OK. What I find really sick and astonishingly wrong is the Liberals trying to circumvent the Hyde Amendment so that my tax dollars will be spent by the federal government on subsidizing abortion on-demand.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the catch. You have to separate out elective abortions from medical procedures, or not provide federal funds for insurance premiums; otherwise you violate the Hyde Amendment and the sensibilities of a lot of Americans.</p>
<p>As for the supposed forced consumerism, as long as there&#8217;s a &#8220;Public Option,&#8221; this is just an attempt to nationalize health insurance over the next decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Mahan Jaramillo</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/one-small-victory/#comment-12988</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Mahan Jaramillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonolan.net/?p=13387#comment-12988</guid>
		<description>Jonolan - 
Hey just holding the line these days is getting increasingly difficult for everyone.  At least give it a small smile, if not a full out get-your-groove-on. :) And maybe be a little bit nicer to Democrats, since there were 64 of them in favor of Stupak.  

What I find really sick and astonishingly stupid in the Bill is having a separate Insurance provider for abortions!  Would this be something one has to have  at all times, like car insurance, yet if  birth control malfunction left someone unexpectedly pregnant, would her condition prevent her from getting &quot;Abortion Insurance&quot; because it would then be deemed a &quot;pre-existing&quot; condition? I cannot imagine the &quot;abortion Insurance&quot; would be any different than regular insurance, where practically being alive is considered a pre-existing condition.

Repulsive.

On another note - 

I am just quite surprised at how much this bill is  disliked by Republicans, when it is still knee-deep in the forced consumerism for profit pool. 

Anyway, there are a few small victories for each side, and a LOT of grumbling and unhappiness from both sides, so now we just have to wait and see what the Senate presents, and let Congress hash it out.

I already had my own fit yesterday on &quot;WH&quot;, and today is live my life day, get some work done, Bobby has a book review to write, etc.

Upwards and onwards!

Cheers,
Kel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonolan &#8211;<br />
Hey just holding the line these days is getting increasingly difficult for everyone.  At least give it a small smile, if not a full out get-your-groove-on. <img src='http://blog.jonolan.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And maybe be a little bit nicer to Democrats, since there were 64 of them in favor of Stupak.  </p>
<p>What I find really sick and astonishingly stupid in the Bill is having a separate Insurance provider for abortions!  Would this be something one has to have  at all times, like car insurance, yet if  birth control malfunction left someone unexpectedly pregnant, would her condition prevent her from getting &#8220;Abortion Insurance&#8221; because it would then be deemed a &#8220;pre-existing&#8221; condition? I cannot imagine the &#8220;abortion Insurance&#8221; would be any different than regular insurance, where practically being alive is considered a pre-existing condition.</p>
<p>Repulsive.</p>
<p>On another note &#8211; </p>
<p>I am just quite surprised at how much this bill is  disliked by Republicans, when it is still knee-deep in the forced consumerism for profit pool. </p>
<p>Anyway, there are a few small victories for each side, and a LOT of grumbling and unhappiness from both sides, so now we just have to wait and see what the Senate presents, and let Congress hash it out.</p>
<p>I already had my own fit yesterday on &#8220;WH&#8221;, and today is live my life day, get some work done, Bobby has a book review to write, etc.</p>
<p>Upwards and onwards!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Kel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

