It’s A Stone Bitch
Karma’s a stone bitch sometimes as the filthy terrorist supporting enemy of America, Julian Assange has just found out to his discomfort, angst and hopefully chagrin.
The Guardian, got their hands on a leaked police report detailing the sexual assault charges against Assange and published them.
It is reported that Julian Assange and his attorneys are livid over this disclosure of the nature of the claims that have been filed against him with Swedish courts.
In a move that surprised many of Mr Assange’s closest supporters on Saturday, The Guardian newspaper published previously unseen police documents that accused Mr Assange in graphic detail of sexually assaulting two Swedish women. One witness is said to have stated: “Not only had it been the world’s worst screw, it had also been violent.”
Bjorn Hurtig, Mr Assange’s Swedish lawyer, said he would lodge a formal complaint to the authorities and ask them to investigate how such sensitive police material leaked into the public domain. “It is with great concern that I hear about this because it puts Julian and his defence in a bad position,” he told a colleague.
“I do not like the idea that Julian may be forced into a trial in the media. And I feel especially concerned that he will be presented with the evidence in his own language for the first time when reading the newspaper. I do not know who has given these documents to the media, but the purpose can only be one thing – trying to make Julian look bad.”
Mr Assange is facing criminal allegations in Sweden over claims by two women that he sexually assaulted them while he was in the country earlier this year.
~*~
A spokesman for The Guardian said: “Julian is not a confidential source. The argument that the papers involved with the WikiLeaks cables should not report criticism of him is one all journalists would find ridiculous.”
It’s not really shocking that, now that the shoe in other foot, Assange and the vermin representing him aren’t happy about leaks. Such rank hypocrisy is to be totally expected from such misborn creatures.
Yes, karma can be a stone bitch and she’s chosen to bite Assange in the ass in an incredibly poetic fashion. It couldn’t truly happen to a more deserving vermin, though he and those he’s worked with or who provide him with material support deserve far sterner and final punishment than these charges will provide for.
Tags: Assange | Crime | England | Hypocrisy | Journalism | Media | Politics | Rape | Sweden | Terrorism | Terrorists
December 21st, 2010 at 6:16 pm
ROFLMAO!!!!! Oh, my. Karma is a bitch, aint it though. ::::giggle::::
December 22nd, 2010 at 5:25 am
Yeah, I got a kick out of too.
Not as much of a kick as I’ll get if and when the government exterminates the filth, but a kick nonetheless.
December 22nd, 2010 at 9:26 am
Don’t get too excited. The woman in question is a radical feminist who first claimed to have been raped then not and now maybe. Her lawyer is also a self-proclaimed radical feminist. He failed to get a client free from 8 murder charges where there was no technical evidence and no witnesses putting the suspect even remotely close to the scene of the murders. All this because he wanted to be the lawyer of a serial killer and enjoy the media attention rather than defending a pathological lier. The prosecutor is also a feminist who is quoted referring to men accused – but not convicted – of sex crime as perps. She is also and old friend of the womans lawyer.
So not many here believe there is any substance in the charges.
December 22nd, 2010 at 9:35 am
Yep, that’s what some “people” are claiming, Paradigm. However, slandering and attacking the characters of victims of sexual assault is a normal course of action for the perpetrators and their lawyers. Additionally, Assange’s followers have gone to great lengths to do the same.
Hence, I take such statements with more than a few grains of salt.
Also, I’m not particularly concerned about those charges; they’re an internal matter for the Swedes to deal with as they see fit.
Oddly though – and more humorously in the light of Assange’s whining – the Guardian’s article brought up those same points. 😀
December 23rd, 2010 at 7:03 am
Apart from her lawyer being more into the media attention than saving his client, everyting I said above are undisputed facts.
This whole sex affair is not good, regardless of how you view Assange. The discussion is supposed to be about Wikileaks and whether he broke the law etc. It’s typical of how media divert attention from important issues to focus on something sensational that they hope will attract more attention.
December 23rd, 2010 at 7:08 am
Actually, Paradigm, that only addresses / attacks one of the cases involved. There are a few more sexual assault charges – sort of – awaiting Assange in Sweden, though those would be considered odd, at best, by American or UK legal standards.
Again though, those are internal matters for the Swedes to deal with and not high on my list of things to worry about.
Nor do I particularly care if Assange and Wikileaks broke any laws. That they attacked the US and put our people in jeopardy is quite enough for me to decide that those vermin need to be killed and no laws need or should be involved in the matter.
January 6th, 2011 at 5:00 pm
I hope somebody kills you soon withhout any law.
January 6th, 2011 at 6:54 pm
Haista paska, Kusipää!
BTW – In the likely chance that you’re just another coward hiding behind a proxy and can’t read Finnish, that’s roughly “Fuck off, Pisshead!”
January 8th, 2011 at 5:07 pm
“Nor do I particularly care if Assange and Wikileaks broke any laws. That they attacked the US and put our people in jeopardy is quite enough for me to decide that those vermin need to be killed and no laws need or should be involved in the matter.”
Just a mental exercise, but im wondering how you feel abut the following quote..
“Nor do I particularly care if Israel broke any laws. That they attacked the Gaza strip and put the Palestinian people in jeopardy is quite enough for me to decide that those vermin need to be killed and no laws need or should be involved in the matter.”
Fair and even handed, right jonolan?
January 8th, 2011 at 6:54 pm
Well, Merl – on the off chance you’re more than another drive-by ranter from anti-American Assange cult, I’ll respond to your jibe.
I don’t have a particular problem with your statement. That’s exactly how the Muslims and their various shills and enablers feel about Israel’s existence and defense thereof and is part of the reality that we live in.
Some problems just can’t be solved by laws, especially international law. That’s why we all keep military forces and/or espionage forces.
January 8th, 2011 at 7:56 pm
I don’t give a damn about Assange personally, but i do feel that information is power.
The attempts of government (and propaganda outlets like faux news) to control our access to information is an attempt to rob us of power and freedom.
Very “big Government” if you ask me!
“Some problems just can’t be solved by laws, especially international law. That’s why we all keep military forces and/or espionage forces.”
True, but those forces must act within certain parameters or risk losing credibility. (eg. IDF)