<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Arm And a Leg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/an-arm-and-a-leg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/an-arm-and-a-leg/</link>
	<description>The eclectic ramblings of jonolan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jonolan</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/an-arm-and-a-leg/#comment-14318</link>
		<dc:creator>jonolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonolan.net/?p=16465#comment-14318</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s close to true, pino, or at least not an unfounded assertion. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq#administrative_costs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Physician For a National Health Program&lt;/a&gt;, a pro Single Payer group, claim private insurance&#039;s administrative costs are 31%.

On the other hand, &lt;a href=&quot;http://hr.cch.com/news/benefits/100209.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CCH&#039;s report&lt;/a&gt; - aimed at companies shopping for benefits and at potential investors - has the figure at a baseline of 10.4% but with a lot of variance based upon type of plan.

In any event, health insurance has a lot of administrative overhead and few other sorts of costs, so would normally show a high administrative overhead.

Some examples of that overhead:
&lt;div class=&quot;entry&quot;&gt;
&lt;ul class=&quot;highlight&quot;&gt;
 &lt;li &gt;Marketing—including research, plan designs, advertising, broker payments, rating, and underwriting.&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;Provider and medical management—provider network and contracts; quality administration and reporting; and medical and pharmacy management.&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;Account and member administration—enrollment and billing; claims; information technology; customer service; communications, and fraud control.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Corporate services—finance and accounting; actuarial services; risk management; legal compliance and filing; corporate executives and governance; and investment services.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
I don&#039;t see where there should be much of a problem with the above. Insurance is, after all a people-centric service industry and one that requires a great deal management in order to function anywhere close to well.

BTW - welcome! I&#039;m glad you stopped by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s close to true, pino, or at least not an unfounded assertion. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq#administrative_costs">Physician For a National Health Program</a>, a pro Single Payer group, claim private insurance&#8217;s administrative costs are 31%.</p>
<p>On the other hand, <a href="http://hr.cch.com/news/benefits/100209.asp">CCH&#8217;s report</a> &#8211; aimed at companies shopping for benefits and at potential investors &#8211; has the figure at a baseline of 10.4% but with a lot of variance based upon type of plan.</p>
<p>In any event, health insurance has a lot of administrative overhead and few other sorts of costs, so would normally show a high administrative overhead.</p>
<p>Some examples of that overhead:</p>
<div class="entry">
<ul class="highlight">
<li>Marketing—including research, plan designs, advertising, broker payments, rating, and underwriting.</li>
<li>Provider and medical management—provider network and contracts; quality administration and reporting; and medical and pharmacy management.</li>
<li>Account and member administration—enrollment and billing; claims; information technology; customer service; communications, and fraud control.</li>
<li>Corporate services—finance and accounting; actuarial services; risk management; legal compliance and filing; corporate executives and governance; and investment services.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>I don&#8217;t see where there should be much of a problem with the above. Insurance is, after all a people-centric service industry and one that requires a great deal management in order to function anywhere close to well.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; welcome! I&#8217;m glad you stopped by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pino</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/an-arm-and-a-leg/#comment-14317</link>
		<dc:creator>pino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonolan.net/?p=16465#comment-14317</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To be fair and accurate, neither the insurance companies or the hospitals are currently predatory in nature, operating as they do with a 3% – 4% profit margin&lt;/i&gt;

But but but...they have a 30-40% administration margin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To be fair and accurate, neither the insurance companies or the hospitals are currently predatory in nature, operating as they do with a 3% – 4% profit margin</i></p>
<p>But but but&#8230;they have a 30-40% administration margin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

